When two cards or CPU of the same series, with the same architecture, have a different TDP, you can easily affirm that the card with the lowest TDP will draw less power. Also when the gap is really high (i.e. 20W TDP vs 250W TDP, you can blindly say that the first card will consume less power :])
Typical case, B3 Kentsfield vs G0 Kentsfield. 105W vs 95W. The G0 could achieve higher clocks with the same amount of power (or same speed with less power).
So off course TDP != power drawn from the socket, it's heavily related on the architecture.
It doesn't change the fact that you have paid for a CPU that have a worse performance/price ratio (and overclocking potential) than its Intel counterparts :sMy Phenom II X4 has yet to fail me. Among other things, runs FFXIV like a charm >.>
No one ever said that AMD CPU cannot run XIV well, but it's been a while since AMD was ahead in high end CPU for gaming enthusiast.
Well, Sandy Bridge i5 have a better $/performance ratio in games than i7. There is no point to buy a 2600K for gaming, 2500K do just as good (and can be overclocked more easily due to the lack of HT).the Intel hype is old if it is not an i7 go with AMD.
The 2500K was $215 at release, the 2600K was $300+... For a gain that was often not even noticeable in any game (<1fps).



).
Reply With Quote

