Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 292

Thread: PS3 UI Screens

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonyB View Post
    Lmao I gotta love MMO players, say 1 bad thing that goes against the game they play and they pounce on you like savage dogs. Jesus get over it
    Aion does not have great graphics, let alone compariable to XIV 1.0 or probably even 2.0 lol. Aion's graphics are horrible even for that era. I would have used Lineage II as an example if we're comparing two different aesthetics.

    outside in Uldah and look in that blurry distance
    That's called Depth of Field.

    how about zoom your camera out while on the chocobo while you are at it to have that nice little lag aswell while moving.
    No I don't.

    you need to wait 5 minutes to have a small amount of people pop on the screen.
    That's a limitation not caused by graphics.

    I'd show you a screen of a siege on korean servers where there was like 400+ people appeared on the screen, insane.
    That client is designed to show 400+ people at a time, XIV's is not.

    So now this is the highlight of the thread again anyone else want another go while we at it? If not get over it omg, quit crying at peoples opinions
    "Aion's graphics are better than XIVs" isn't an opinion.
    (3)

  2. #2
    Player
    AntonyB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    241
    Character
    Miss Wildfire
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Elexia View Post
    Aion does not have great graphics, let alone compariable to XIV 1.0 or probably even 2.0 lol. Aion's graphics are horrible even for that era. I would have used Lineage II as an example if we're comparing two different aesthetics.

    That's called Depth of Field.

    No I don't.

    That's a limitation not caused by graphics.

    That client is designed to show 400+ people at a time, XIV's is not.

    "Aion's graphics are better than XIVs" isn't an opinion.
    Right because I change DoF in the sound settings because it has nothing to do with graphics, ok then. Its limitations you say, yet on 1 PC I have a better card than the other and NPCs appear alot faster on the PC with the higher grade GPU, because its due to limitations and not graphics. Aion's graphics are better than XIVs is my own personal opinion, so how is it not an opinion, am I missing something here?

    Also, never played L2, sorry. Only XI/XIV/Aion/WoW/PW/SW. :/
    (0)

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonyB View Post
    Right because I change DoF in the sound settings because it has nothing to do with graphics, ok then. Its limitations you say, yet on 1 PC I have a better card than the other and NPCs appear alot faster on the PC with the higher grade GPU, because its due to limitations and not graphics. Aion's graphics are better than XIVs is my own personal opinion, so how is it not an opinion, am I missing something here?

    Also, never played L2, sorry. Only XI/XIV/Aion/WoW/PW/SW. :/
    Your specs will have better or poorer performance but that doesn't change the fact XIV is designed to show a limited amount of PCs and NPCs at one time (around 40 I believe.) That is a design limitation.
    (1)

  4. #4
    Player
    Soukyuu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,086
    Character
    Crim Soukyuu
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonyB View Post
    Aion's graphics are better than XIVs is my own personal opinion
    It's fine to have your own opinion, the problem here is that what you are mentioning as "better graphics" is actually "better engine" and "better aesthetics". Which 2.0 will (hopefully) get with ARR.

    Graphics is about texture quality, details and effects you can have, while NPC display count, background drawing quality and graphics/camera lag is about how optimized the engine is. Aesthetics are something completely different and independent, namely how much attention to little details like physically correct, smooth animations, overall design of the world etc was given by the designers.
    (2)

    [ AMD Phenom II X4 970BE@4GHz | 12GB DDR3-RAM@CL7 | nVidia GeForce 260GTX OC | Crucial m4 SSD ]

  5. #5
    Player
    AntonyB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    241
    Character
    Miss Wildfire
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Soukyuu View Post
    It's fine to have your own opinion, the problem here is that what you are mentioning as "better graphics" is actually "better engine" and "better aesthetics". Which 2.0 will (hopefully) get with ARR.

    Graphics is about texture quality, details and effects you can have, while NPC display count, background drawing quality and graphics/camera lag is about how optimized the engine is. Aesthetics are something completely different and independent, namely how much attention to little details like physically correct, smooth animations, overall design of the world etc was given by the designers.
    To be quite honest, I'm not even sure why everyone keeps bringing up aesthetics, it was nowhere in the discussion until someone brought it up, do you even know why the discussion was brought up? It was said that FFXIV is the end all be all in the "graphics" department. Also correct me if I'm wrong since I'm not a game designer, but im pretty sure it's a "graphics" unit that processes all these things, not an aesthetics unit. Either way pointless discussion that has gone on long enough, which I'm not going to continue to talk about because it seems everyone seems to know better, you know, being the internet and all.

    2.0 looks amazing without a doubt, looking forward to it.
    (0)

  6. #6
    Player
    Soukyuu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,086
    Character
    Crim Soukyuu
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonyB View Post
    To be quite honest, I'm not even sure why everyone keeps bringing up aesthetics, it was nowhere in the discussion until someone brought it up, do you even know why the discussion was brought up?
    The one who brought it up was you -.-
    I tried to explain it to you twice now, I guess I'm just bad at it.

    Also correct me if I'm wrong since I'm not a game designer, but im pretty sure it's a "graphics" unit that processes all these things, not an aesthetics unit.
    Yes. It still doesn't change the fact that what you see as "graphics" is composed from different components, one of them being graphic quality (=what is better in FFXIV), design consistency/quality (=aesthetics=what is better in Aion) and engine optimization (=what makes NPCs appear faster and the camera lag less)
    (0)

    [ AMD Phenom II X4 970BE@4GHz | 12GB DDR3-RAM@CL7 | nVidia GeForce 260GTX OC | Crucial m4 SSD ]

  7. #7
    Player
    AntonyB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    241
    Character
    Miss Wildfire
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Jennestia View Post
    Just posting doesn't make something an opinion or fact -- What you post does however. What you're saying in other words is you can post something like "Hey, Mcdonalds sells burgers!" and you would say that's your opinion.
    Actually I would have needed to say, I KNOW Aion has better graphics to make it a statement, but seeing as I didin't it would imply that is what I THINK(personal opinion not anyone elses). Please stop trying to look good because you yourself don't even know the difference.

    Let me word it for you:
    Aion has better graphics - Its not stating anything, its just an opinion. Ofcourse better wording could be used tho.

    MaccyDs sells burgers - Well I/u KNOW that, so would would be a statement rather than an opinion.

    Please, stop trying so hard.

    Quote Originally Posted by Soukyuu View Post
    The one who brought it up was you -.-
    I tried to explain it to you twice now, I guess I'm just bad at it.

    Yes. It still doesn't change the fact that what you see as "graphics" is composed from different components, one of them being graphic quality (=what is better in FFXIV), design consistency/quality (=aesthetics=what is better in Aion) and engine optimization (=what makes NPCs appear faster and the camera lag less)
    Actually original post was here:
    Quote Originally Posted by YuriSan View Post
    XIV's graphics are by far the best out there for an MMO..
    You can tell what fabric your clothes are made of if you look close... u can see fibers and shit..
    Enviorment, weather, wall textures, plantage, mobs' details, armor glow, realistic movement,shadows, cutscenes....
    Where else have you guys seen better than this game's graphics. its an MMO ffs..... chill people.

    I fu**** love this game's graphics. and i dun even play ALL max!
    Then I replied, because I totally started it right? You know because replying to something means starting the entire discussion? Yes people was not happy with the reply so best all shoot that person because of what they said, lol. Also even if you look he's talking about aesthetics aswell, why not jump on his ass because he confused them with graphics?! Oh right because he fanboy'd it and I didn't, heh.
    (0)
    Last edited by AntonyB; 10-14-2012 at 10:52 PM.

  8. #8
    Player
    Abriael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    4,821
    Character
    Abriael Rosen
    World
    Goblin
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonyB View Post
    Aion has better graphics - Its not stating anything, its just an opinion. Ofcourse better wording could be used tho.
    You can say that the sky is green with yellow polka dots, and hide between the "it's an opinion!" excuse. That dosn't make it less nonsensical.

    Aion's graphics are outdated, flat and undetailed. There's absolutely no point of view under which they can be considered "better" than those you find in FFXIV, 1.0 or ARR.
    (0)

  9. #9
    Player
    Soukyuu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,086
    Character
    Crim Soukyuu
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonyB View Post
    Also even if you look he's talking about aesthetics aswell, why not jump on his ass because he confused them with graphics?! Oh right because he fanboy'd it and I didn't, heh.
    If you think I'm jumping you, you are mistaken. If I was jumping you, I'd said something along the lines of your opinion not being an opinion.

    If you see an attempt to clarify aesthetics vs graphics to you as "jumping you" then maybe you're being a bit too sensitive about it.

    And the reason I didn't "jump" him is simple: I only skimmed over the post. Indirectly calling me a fanboy is rather hilarious considering some of my post on these forums, especially regarding ARR
    (0)

    [ AMD Phenom II X4 970BE@4GHz | 12GB DDR3-RAM@CL7 | nVidia GeForce 260GTX OC | Crucial m4 SSD ]

  10. #10
    Player
    Xmbei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,030
    Character
    Kiros Forsa
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Elexia View Post
    "Aion's graphics are better than XIVs" isn't an opinion.
    Thank you oh all powerful, god of FFXI naysayers for the future of FFXIV. Thank you for telling us what our opinion is, from your own mouth, oh thank you oh great one!

    On topic, These graphics are amazing, for a PS3 Console MMORPG. There is so much you can do. You can never compare single-player game graphics to MMORPG graphics because the infrastructure is built entirely different, and sacrifices at parts that are expected in single player games to make it run and work and look optimally.
    (0)
    Xeto Milanti Bei

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast