Quote Originally Posted by Raikki View Post
He didn't roll at 1/2. Four people each rolled at 1/4 and the winner donated it to one of the others. You continue to ignore the fact that the winner contributed to the hamlet just as much and is just as entitled to his reward of choice as anyone else in the party.
2/4 is the same as 1/2. You are arguing semantics. The bottom line is a person who didn't need, and could not use even if he wanted to, rolled on an item with the sole intention of giving it to a person who was already rolling on it. It is the same as letting one person roll twice.