Results 1 to 10 of 122

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    288
    Quote Originally Posted by Renen View Post
    I love how people say "because its used as storage"
    But why not just make it impossible to use for storage?
    I dont often check bazaar simply because i know that 90% of items there are priced 99999999 gil.
    But if u couldn't use em as storage, maybe people would use em to actually sell things?
    If people can't use their bazaars for storage then they will go to their other use... jack shit. They won't be used and you're not fooling anyone. lol

    NO ONE is going to be actively trying to sell something in their bazaar that is constantly moving and unsearchable over using the Wards/AH. NO ONE. You included.
    (1)
    - Kurokikaze
    This is how I feel when I read posts on these boards:

  2. #2
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,948
    If you ever played FFXI the bazaar system from that game worked exactly like that. If it was a tradable item, I could toss it in my bazaar, the item was still in my inventory I just couldn't interact with it until I removed it from my bazaar.
    If you read my post or played the game you'd understand that despite the fact that the FFXI bazaar works that way, it still has the "store stuff in it for 999999999 gil" problem. Yes, they do get used more for their intended purpose, but this problem can not be eliminated.

    1. the wards in all cities need to be linked. - check
    2. we need to be able to search specifically for HQ or NQ items. - check
    3. we need to be able to search specifically for melded or non-melded items. - check
    I'd like to add one thing to that list:
    Be able to call retainer or otherwise list items from the same interface used to access the search menu, such that we can put items up for sale more quickly.

    If it were efficient, bug free and functional then I would completely agree.
    Good thing they're taking steps in 2.0 to make it more efficient, bug free and functional then.
    (2)
    Last edited by Alhanelem; 10-03-2012 at 07:02 AM.