Quote Originally Posted by Vanguard319 View Post
So what? I started out as an archer, I leveled it all the way to 50, then unlocked bard, and as I said before I never once cried about the fact I had to buy ammo. I have given multiple reasons why removing ammo is more trouble than keeping it, the only response I have recieved pretty much amounts to "well I don't like it" in one form or another.

Therefore, I'm just going to claim victory in this debate since the naysayers couldn't come up with anything better than selfish reasons or statements of entitlement.

Ciao.
You lose, I win.

Why because a bunch of baseless reasons similar to the ones you gave.

Arrows is an outdated mechanic, SE could revamp the arrow system and maintain its consumption but they have however choose not to. If you want to revive it then give a good reason why, not ask us why not.

If you are trying to make motion it is on you to give good reason why. And as far as im concerned "it costs money and I think im cool for paying it, makes me l33t" is not a good reason.

More reasonable points to take down:
Gilsink lost - carpteners are getting housing items
Realism lost - Its easy to argue this one either way and I think this is the best bet for argument