Well.. yes I've been arguing that very point. It would be the same technically, yes. However it'd be annoying as hell to deal with larger and larger numbers for no reason. This is why they're dropping a digit instead of adding one in the first place..
Thats not entirely true, but certain items are less effected by inflation then others (mostly those high in supply). However new items specially those unsure of how rare they are would get insane inflated prices.
Not all real world rules cross over into the game world smoothly, but yes generally income does effect pricing of items particularly luxury items.
Last edited by Shougun; 09-18-2012 at 01:36 AM.
Really, a huge amount of gil was created in the early days of the game when leves handed out massive amounts of gil. Most of the gil in the game was created in the first year. People who complain about Atomos spamming have no idea. lol ^^;;
This really is the only way to correct this.
Waiting to read an official translation of that Yoshi-P post this morning. I don't trust Google translator's gibberish. :P
edit: I was too late. NoctisUmbra was faster
No more arrows for Archers? What?! lol
Making new thread so this ne isn't derailed.
If you seriously have that much gil you have much bigger underlying problems then losing a piece of it.
Mo' money mo' problems!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.