ARR Gil Cap Reduction

[Duuude007]

lol 8 people is not many, but I give you props on time spent on the game vs someone that has nothing to lose.

You mean 63 people?

Pro is SORELY out of date.

[Chardrizard]

Him spending too much time ingame is probably why basic economics seems hard for him.

[Gugnir]

1 billion or 100 mil. Gil cap is the gil cap either way so who cares. It's business as usual.

[DonMega]

hopefully they take the same thought process to the stat values... having 300 of a stats is just stupid

[Sev]

Suck up your medicine like good puppies.

I don't care about the gil just the time spent earning it.

If the time spent to earn said gil in ARR is relative to V1 then I have nothing to complain about.

We all know the real reason for this is that they don't want super rich players running about buying up the world in ARR.

I would rather they just told the truth instead of some lame excuse about arrow prices.

[NoctisUmbra]

Oh man... after reading pages and pages in an attempt to catch up on the discussion, I have to say all that ended up happening is me laughing out loud on multiple occasions.

It's just deliciously ironic to see people who don't get it and think they're losing wealth call others stupid/dupes/etc.

[TheRac25]

It's very likely performance related. They'll be able to make the database more efficient by only having to store and retrieve smaller values. Reducing the significant digit by 1 for something accessed as much as virtual currency can result in huge overall processing gains.

wrong, a 32 bit number holds 4,294,967,295, and putting numbers into memory smaller than the bitness of the processor is actually a performance hit, please stop pulling stuff out of your crack

[darkstarpoet1]

i do have a question on this matter. with the value of my gil going up in ARR x10 times is the value of my 1 gil in ARR worth more than 1 of gath's gil in 1.0?

i understand his 1 gil is worth more than mine now, but when mine is worth 10x what it is will it then be worth more?

the reason i ask is because if not i would like to invest in alot of gath's gil.

[Keith_Dragoon]

I'll have 8.1k come 2.0, time to warm up the cardboard box, imma be homeless!

[NoctisUmbra]

Actually you should still hoard gil. Gonna be more things to spend on.

Unless you're one of those people that actually still thinks that the more Gil you have the more wealth you're losing. In which case, carry on good sir. Better for the rest of us.

Jolly good.