No please.

No please.

I would not mind as long as it just stuff for looks, pets and chocobo clothing.



No just no.
i say heck no unless theu had gill for use to buy it would make it difficult for rmt companies why would some one need to get gill from thier site when they can get it from se they can make it apper out of thin air
You start with 1-2 items in cash shops and then the game goes into F2P with a 50-100 items cash shops, NO THANKS!
A Legacy Social/Endgame NA Linkshell & Free Company


I support cash shops for items like costumes, level up packs(for the more impatient players) and expansions alongside a hybrid F2P and subscription-based model. Naturally I'll be going subscription, but it could be a great extra source of revenue for Square-Enix, who in turn could produce better content and give more support to FFXIV long-term if done correctly.
I'm sure SE is paying careful attention to what's going on with games like Guild Wars 2, The Old Republic, and TERA.



This single idea scares me. To me, that's basically pay to win, since those people with more money than brains will be able to just buy their way to the cap. I had enough of that in Imperian, and I never want to go through it again.I support cash shops for items like costumes, level up packs(for the more impatient players) and expansions alongside a hybrid F2P and subscription-based model. Naturally I'll be going subscription, but it could be a great extra source of revenue for Square-Enix, who in turn could produce better content and give more support to FFXIV long-term if done correctly.
I'm sure SE is paying careful attention to what's going on with games like Guild Wars 2, The Old Republic, and TERA.


This is a valid concern, but think of it this way: How many incompetent, intolerable louts have you met at high-level areas or events that played, not bought, their way through everything and are still incompetent and intolerable? You'd still avoid those players, right? You wouldn't play with these guys either. What's the difference between that and another douchy player buying his way through stuff?
Nobody loses in either scenario, but SE gains something in the latter. As long as people can get all the same abilities and whatnot through the natural course of the game(I.E. never introduce buy-only abilities), then I don't see too big of an issue.



this thread has given me the giggles about the opinion of the "P2P Onry".
I support a P2P with CASH SHOP!![]()
![]()
![]()


No thanks! This is not a crappy free to play game. :P
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote





