Please Reconsider Splitting Main and Off-Tank Roles Based on Job

[Mikey_R]

I think you are trying very hard to redefine what feedback means just so you can dismiss it.

Not dismiss, call it what it is. I said it was a list of concerns, that is hardly dismissing it.

Feedback is not only a reaction to finalized tooltips, exact potencies, or a playable build. That is closer to a post-release bug report.

Feedback needs to based on some factual information, not potential speculation.

Feedback can be about direction, terminology, design risks, and the possible consequences of what was officially shown.

You don't know the direction, you don't know how well the terminology fits, you don't know the design risks, you do not know the possible consequences with an sort of accuracy, therefore, not feedback.

You keep repeating “we need more information” as if that somehow deletes the concern. It does not. It only proves the point: if the terminology is vague enough that people are confused, then asking for clarification and raising risks is valid feedback.

I never said it deletes the concern, just reminding that you aren't going to get more info until at least Berlin.

You say we cannot give feedback because we do not know enough.

Then you also say MT/OT roles are coming regardless.

So again, which one is it?

We do not now enough, but we do know that the MT/OT split is, as of this post, coming to EC.

At this point, I'm more interested in what you think the MT/OT role is actually going to play in FFXIV, as you seem to have some sort of picture already.