Level Cap Lock Based on MSQ Progress

[Dreadlime]

The game practally throws exp at you. If you're doing dailies, keeping up with unlocks, and pvping alongside the MSQ; it adds up pretty fast. It also means you can play side jobs, enjoy a variety of content, and still be on level for MSQ. I have more of an issue with queue times for dungeons and trial than I do with the amount of exp the game gives me.

[Bryson]

I'm not talking about someone taking time and enjoying. I'm talking about people full maxing out multiple jobs without unlocking more than HW.

and that harms you how exactly? what business is it of of hours how someone levels?

[Atreus]

It would be better for longevity to revisit level sync and its impact on your available abilities. Then this whole issue wouldn't even matter.

[PyurBlue]

Right now, it’s very easy to overlevel or even hit max level on jobs without being anywhere near caught up in the story.

This is fine, and even preferable for some players.

The MSQ is the backbone of the entire experience—it unlocks dungeons, trials, systems, and gives context to everything you’re doing. But because leveling is so accessible through roulettes, side content, and bonuses, a lot of players end up prioritizing EXP over narrative progression.

That's their choice to make.

If level caps were gradually unlocked based on MSQ milestones, it would naturally guide players to experience the story at a more intended pace. You’d still have flexibility to level multiple jobs, but you wouldn’t be able to completely outpace the content that gives those levels meaning.

What is being outpaced anyway? Dungeons are synced. Story duties are synced. The only thing that gets bypassed is having to grind gear that gets outdated in 10 minutes. I don't see the loss.

This could also help new players feel less overwhelmed. Instead of racing to max level and then realizing they still have hundreds of quests to go, progression would feel more cohesive and rewarding step by step.

I've never heard anyone overwhelmed by leveling pace. The common suggestion to avoid wasting XP in novice network is to try other jobs.

I’m not saying restrict freedom entirely—but aligning level progression more closely with MSQ progression could make the overall experience feel a lot more intentional and immersive.

I don't see any benefits personally. I'd think it would make things worse.

I see a lot of level 80 players with content no higher than alexander unlocked and its really bumming out my queues.

What would change? You'd have level 60 players instead of level 80 but synced to 60 players in your roulette.

I would in fact argue for the opposite: To stop the MSQ from artificially blocking my exploration into areas which are clearly connected.

This I can support. ARR being free to explore was great. The rest of the game should follow.

[Reginald_Cain]

OP are you one of miguel's alt accounts? you both have no job stone bases classes set as your mains

[DRKoftheAzure]

If it further exposes how bland and boring ARR content ACTUALLY IS when over HALF of your abilities and traits just straight up don't work because of how bad level sync ACTUALLY IS, then I'm all for it...

[Uzephi]

I see a lot of level 80 players with content no higher than alexander unlocked and its really bumming out my queues.

I don't see how that correlates to bumming you out. If he was level locked at 60, what difference would it make for you? You'd still be stuck in Alex and they'd be 20 levels lower. I don't see how this change would make your que any better. Please logic better when making a stance.