More Roulettes Please.

[LanceSummers]

Certain parts of the game are lacking roulettes to a major extent. No Daily Challenge for Crystalline Conflict? Why?
Also, content like Variant Dungeons and Delubrum Reginae could use a Misc./Variant Roulette.
Chocobo Racing Roulette too?
Any other suggestions for content lacking roulettes would be appreciated!

[Jeeqbit]

A chocobo racing roulette wouldn't make sense because there is just one chocobo race for your tier in any 30 seconds. We have a challenge log for doing it each week as well which makes people do it.

Most obvious need for one is Rival Wings.

[Raim]

Im baffled how we didnt get a variant roulette by now. Just let the NPC pick the route to remove any friction players would have about route choice.

[Rein_eon_Osborne]

Something that I mused together with my friend group before, is that we can probably use less of the 'samey' roulettes to make room for more varieties. For example:

1. NR & Trials. Why separate them? They have been designing both kinds quite literally the same unless you count the coils, but those weren't even in NR so why bother separating the two?
2. High-level Dungeon & Leveling also falls into this but there might be a remnant of old design choice that warrants their separation from older expac that I'm unaware of. But until then, I think these two also overlaps too much & can be safely merged.
3. Expert & Lv100 Dungeon. Self explanatory tbh. In addition to that, today's Expert + the extended patch cycle just worsens the monotony. Just merge them.

So that's three roulette slots cleared, they can probably add something like:

1. Rival Wing Roulette. Self explanatory. There are talks about not wanting to kill the quality of games due to existence of "I'm just here for exp"-bros, so I'm kinda on the fence. Also for the love of Zodiark, pls bring back Astralagos lmao.
2. Unreal Dungeon Roulette. In the place of missing "2nd cap lv roulette", they create upscaled version of every existing dungeon - the same way they create Unreal EXs, then slap them into this single roulette. Personally I think this is slightly more interesting than to seeing them dividing the already small pool of cap lv dungeons into two roulettes that people largely only touch one of 'em.

Missing tomes & experiences can be distributed proper between existing roulette.

[Striker44]

Something that I mused together with my friend group before, is that we can probably use less of the 'samey' roulettes to make room for more varieties. For example:

1. NR & Trials. Why separate them? They have been designing both kinds quite literally the same unless you count the coils, but those weren't even in NR so why bother separating the two?
2. High-level Dungeon & Leveling also falls into this but there might be a remnant of old design choice that warrants their separation from older expac that I'm unaware of. But until then, I think these two also overlaps too much & can be safely merged.
3. Expert & Lv100 Dungeon. Self explanatory tbh. In addition to that, today's Expert + the extended patch cycle just worsens the monotony. Just merge them.

I'd love to see #3 there, would make Expert less monotonous and also not make all the non-latest current xpac dungeons hard to queue for separately (by people still doing the story). #1 I could go either way on. It would be nice, but sometimes I queue specifically for NR on the off-chance I get both the tomes and one of my WT's checked off, would be less likely to happen if Trials were also mixed in.

I believe #2 stays separate b/c the leveling dungeons are designed to give lots of xp for characters who are leveling, whereas the "high-level" dungeons (better viewed as "max-level per xpac") give much less xp since they're supposed to be done by people already at the max level.

Could probably do with sub-division roulettes covering certain level ranges for those who want to do content only within a certain expansion, with the caveat being that they still have to unlock all of the content they should have access to based on where they are in the MSQ. (So no cheesing by refusing to unlock something.)

The issue is it can defeat the purpose of the roulettes themselves, which is to increase instances popping for new/returning players doing a run for the first time. If you only want to do content within a certain expansion, you can already queue for up to 5 instances within that expansion.

[Azurarok]

I just want them to rebalance earlier content and add IL restrictions so we don't have people trying to IL cheese their dailies

[CCheshire]

I always figured that CC had a niche audience, so no one else would run it other than ppl who were already going to do CC for each new season, like RW and the upcoming mogtome events.

[Mecia]

Salivating at the thought of a Bozja raid roulette

[Aidorouge]

Could probably do with sub-division roulettes covering certain level ranges for those who want to do content only within a certain expansion, with the caveat being that they still have to unlock all of the content they should have access to based on where they are in the MSQ. (So no cheesing by refusing to unlock something.)

Also give people the ability to queue for multiple roulettes at the same time, even if they have to do them all on the same role due to limitations.

[Alicie]

Certain parts of the game are lacking roulettes to a major extent. No Daily Challenge for Crystalline Conflict? Why?
Also, content like Variant Dungeons and Delubrum Reginae could use a Misc./Variant Roulette.
Chocobo Racing Roulette too?
Any other suggestions for content lacking roulettes would be appreciated!

Before they add more roulettes, they need to fix rewards for existing.