Suggestion : Rotationary time for maintenance?

[0blivion]

So OP is oblivious to the lived reality of company worksrs who require regular schedules and have had those self-same schedules for many years. Got it. Take the L, dude, the other people here have told you plenty of times that you are wrong. There aren't too many maintenances, you're just acting entitled.

[AlliciaCapulet]

So OP is oblivious to the lived reality of company worksrs who require regular schedules and have had those self-same schedules for many years. Got it. Take the L, dude, the other people here have told you plenty of times that you are wrong. There aren't too many maintenances, you're just acting entitled.

So let me get this straight,for you, making one suggestion and defending the fact that it's totally doable is acting entitled ? The point of this forum is to make suggestions, or give feedback, and someone from SE reads and report things to the devs team. This thread might be ignored. And I'm not entitled like you are saying to the point of making more threads in the future. I do it once, to tell my point once, and if nothing change, well, I tried.

You tell the other people told me wrong. You mean, 3 persons including you. You guys can disagree with me, but it doesn't mean that you are absolutely right. Yes, in the end, it's more than possible that SE won't change anything, and I'm well aware of it. But why shouldn't I try to ask anyway, just in case? Especially when this is not something impossible to do, even if it's easier to just don't do anything.

Also you can say that there aren't too many maintenances, again, that's debatable and it's perfectly fine if they don't bother you, but the only fact that there are multiple thread on this forum and one recent on the first page is proof enough that some people disagree with your statement.

You don't have to attack me personally if you disagree. I'm not acting entilted, I'm just taking this media to express my opinion and suggest something that I personnaly find a good idea. You can do as you said first, and go "next". You made your point, you disagree, good enough. Anyway, I'm moving "next" with you and won't answer to anything else from you on this thread.