No, I just see it as another (somewhat unlikely) potential theory that doesn't really have much substance to it. But I'm also not so needlessly and bizarrely embittered towards the Ancients that I flatly refuse to see any possibility or merit of their having any further part in the story, so there's that.
...that's not even remotely correct. Pandaemonium aside, I haven't found much enjoyable in the way of the Ancients since Shadowbringers, in either the story or its characters. Most of the other plot threads I do or have enjoyed were either brought to a close or more or less obliterated by Endwalker's abrupt tying of ARR's loose knots, save perhaps the Void, and Dawntrail was so appallingly bad it scared away half the playerbase.To be clear I don't expect you to find that more interesting, you've been quite open that your entire interest in this game begins and ends with a single Endwalker zone. But I'm hoping someone else sees where I'm coming from; I think there's a lot more to this game's world than over-centralizing theories like this give it credit for.
Contrary to what you think, I am not on the edge of my seat hoping this is Azem, and if anything I'm more concerned with how they deliver what's coming, and not what it is, because they've been failing magnificently in their ability to deliver a half-decent story for several years now. I was wondering if the theory could work, in light of what we do know, when you started on your dedicated and entirely unbiased soliloquy as to how boring you find the Ancients and why that means it couldn't possibly be true. Which is... your choice, but why you feel the need to sour any and all discussion when it involves something you don't like instead of saying "hm, maybe, but not for me" is something you might want to think about.
There's also a deep irony somewhere in being accused of being focused on my own personal preferences and then suggesting Venat is the only Ancient left with a potentially interesting story.



Reply With Quote




