Replace "Mitigation" by "% based Mitigation" then. People tend to use that shortcut all the time, apologies for that.




Replace "Mitigation" by "% based Mitigation" then. People tend to use that shortcut all the time, apologies for that.
Secretly had a crush on Mao
Every 2 minutes if we are talking about just the 40%, but the initial idea was a tank that had a pure HP increase model, ie. every cooldown would be a variation of 'increase max HP to survive', which would then hit their 90 seconds and even the short cooldown mitigation. Even further if Rampart were to be replaced to be more job specific. I would include the invuln, but I don't see how an effective HP increase could achieve the same effect, not in a sensible way anyway.
If all of these can effectively reduce the healing required by the healer, you then have a worse problem that what we have now. Remember, this is all assuming the tank has a way to help heal back the damage sustained instead of a HP recovery buff. This could work, but 40% from the tank would be way too much, especially when combined with the fact you get a free heal from the HP increase itself.
Because I'm having too much fun with a simple spreadsheet, a few different scenarios, if the HP increase doesn't have a self heal (but keeps the HP recovery increase), then you need to heal before the hit and then after, but you will heal the same total amount as the % mitigation tank, unless one of those heals falls outside the HP recovery increase, then you will fall short, if the HP recovery increase is not there, then with the heal before and the heal after, you will fall short of getting back to max HP. In the situation I used (which is the same as the one in post #55), you fall short by 10% of the tanks max HP, so, if you wanted a tank that increased it's HP to mitigate damage, and didn't give it a self heal or a HP recovery increase, you would need the tank to make up only 10% of their max HP from another cooldown to balance things out.
So, 10% is a more reasonable value to aim for to make things more balanced in this overly simplistic example, rather than the 40% that you proposed. Remember, we don't want to make healers obsolete.
I should also mention, if we assume the HP increase does come with a self heal to match the HP increase, there is a scenario where it is just free mitigation with no input from a healer required and that is when the damage received is less than the total HP increase as, once the buff wears off, your HP will just go back to it's baseline. But I don't envisage that scenario happening in any content where it would matter and is more of a novelty.
So many weird situations that need to be taken into account for a tank that solely relies upon HP increases for its mitigation. It would make it feel very different to heal though. To be clear, I am not against the idea, I am just throwing around these scenarios that could come up and trying to make things a bit more balanced.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote



