Results 1 to 10 of 31

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Kirutsuki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2023
    Posts
    197
    Character
    Kirutsuki Noel-e'xion
    World
    Spriggan
    Main Class
    Monk Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by TaleraRistain View Post
    No thank you. Tools are already used in endgame content and SE knows they are used but they turn a blind eye so long as other players are not harassed using them. When that does happen, they can come down hard because these tools are against the ToS. If they implemented anything in-game, they dilute their ability to take action against these tools being used against other players. I don't find it likely they will want to upset the careful balance and grey area that exists now.
    Just cause you add a 3rd party tool in the game doesn't make it impossible for them to act on harassment.
    The two aren't mutually inclusive. Harassment is harassment with or without tools being the reason.

    Only thing that would change is them getting more false reports on mild verbal exchange about rotation or something.

    In fact I would argue that they have actually MORE control to ban a player for harassing someone about their DPS than they do now.
    Since they generally have to proove someone is actually using a tool to harass in the first place. Wouldn't you say so?
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    TaleraRistain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    5,608
    Character
    Thalia Beckford
    World
    Jenova
    Main Class
    Gunbreaker Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirutsuki View Post
    Just cause you add a 3rd party tool in the game doesn't make it impossible for them to act on harassment.
    The two aren't mutually inclusive. Harassment is harassment with or without tools being the reason.

    Only thing that would change is them getting more false reports on mild verbal exchange about rotation or something.

    In fact I would argue that they have actually MORE control to ban a player for harassing someone about their DPS than they do now.
    Since they generally have to proove someone is actually using a tool to harass in the first place. Wouldn't you say so?
    It doesn't make it impossible but it weakens their stance. Right now they can say "no third party tools". When they start blurring the line or having to define what is allowed and what is not, then you're going to get rules lawyers constantly trying to push the lines. This is a much simpler solution.
    (2)