
Originally Posted by
xbahax92
It's amusing though, you gotta admit.
People bring their own thoughts totally unrelated to my original post.
People tell me what I should do, or shouldnt do.
People assume I'm intolerant after 4 sentences, lol.
Now you accuse me of rage bait?
Everyone here has their own view and everyone thinks their truth is the only one.
If I said, ribbons and ruffles look girly to me, would it matter? No it doesn't, I just don't use the glamour.
If I said, the new Aiming set from the alliance raid suits only Dancer- it just does not fit BRD/MCH. Any points? Not really.
If I said, I do like the new streetwear glam from PVP, would it change anything? No.
My opinion is no more or less important than anyone else's.
In the end, controversies attract interest. And I think, it worked pretty well.
However, there is one truth I am convinced of. If Rathalos M/F | Omega Attire M/F can exist on any body type - then any set can.
Fending/Maiming/Striking+ Aiming/Scouting + Casting/Healing sets share the same models throughout years. Why not add M/F versions, unrestrict glamours from roles and allow anybody wear what they want?
Still though, the forum never ceases to amaze me.