PvP Frontline, same old, nothing new

[Cidel]

Oh please, don't even try to backpedal like your tone didn't have a passive-aggressive slant to the topic of premades written all-over it. You even already admitted there was jadedness towards them.

- "nothing has changed, it's still a premade fiesta": how in the actual hell is this even aggroing on premades? You'll have to explain this to me because just quoting parts having the word premade inside doesn't instantly make it hostile to premades, you know?

So when you make a thread about how there are "problems" in Frontlines, while going straight into this comment right at the beginning, how is this not harping on the mere existence of premades? And really? How does calling it a 'premade fiesta' not carry a negative connotation the same way people call things "clown fiestas" and such when they mean to mock something? But sure, be pedantic about it. Next thing you're gonna tell me is that fiesta actually technically means celebration or festivities in Spanish so it's actually good.

- "The DRK pulls in are still going stronger than ever": you got me good there, good job. Of course there is DRKs everywhere, they didn't evidently vanish. The meta has just widened on tanks notably, but you'll most often find at least a DRK trying to still pull the usual strat.

Yup, sure did got you good. "It's not even about DRKs that much, but I'll throw it into my opening gripe, just because." And not just going stronger than ever, but also "further compounded," *gasp* If it wasn't some sort of issue to you, you wouldn't have brought it up.

-- "works for games full of pvp FL veterans all with their own little premades": once more, just because there is written premade in the quoted text doesn't make it automatically hostile to premades, and in fact there if you actually take it in context it's specifically written that FL seems balanced for custom FLs full of premades (which is a mode that still shines by its absence).

Let's stop pretending there wasn't an ounce of condemnation in that line. The same way someone flippantly says anything about someone's "own little x." "Their own little clique," "their own little world," etc. Really, why do I even need to explain the obvious passive-aggressiveness tone in your own post? When you ask somebody "is this supposed to be fun?" 19 out of 20 times it's with a sarcastic or acerbic tone.

- "the minority of tryhards" / "tryhard groups will farm their tomes": if you consider tryhard is derogatory, then I apologize, because I don't, especially when it's been seen used countless times by players just speaking along the lines of "I'm tryharding this run".

Well, then I forgive you on this one if you sincerely don't. But by and large most people will see tryhard as carrying derogatory connotations, especially when it's frequently used as a term to describe people who are serious about something that the person using the word finds to be mockingly beneath them. FYI calling someone a "tryhard" and saying you yourself are "tryharding something" carry two separate tones, the same way calling someone a "no-lifer" and saying you are going to "no-life" something have two completely different intentions. But no, you knew that, didn't you? That's why you used "sweaty tryhards" later in the same post.

Like, really. I don't know why I even have to bother explaining it all to you, and while I could definitely give a break-down of every line you want to try and get technical over, it's just easier to identify that you're probably intentionally being pedantic about your word choice in an attempt to gaslight on just how much you actually blame skilled players in premades.

I mean, "how is accusing premades of seal-clubbing hostile to premades?" Really? We're going to be obtuse about the metaphors too? You're right. An activity with a negative implication being used to describe premades can't possibly be construed as being hostile towards premades, right?

-The only one I'll grant to you is that one: "We're still pandering to the few sweaty tryhards that brainlessly steamroll over the rest". It's clearly a blanket statement with derogatory terms like brainless and sweaty. But don't go and pretend that this is the essence of the OP, else you're just being, yes, disingenuous and trying to misconstrue the OP.

Right, because that one would be really hard to come-up with mental gymnastics to convince anybody that you didn't say that without any hint of animosity to the premades that you are so obviously referring to. Seriously, don't you go and pretend that this isn't your entire underlying opinion of the premades "steamrolling" and "seal-clubbing."

I'm glad you decided to include that last one and own-up to it, because that's where the mask slipped and I could infer that the entire thing was full of passive-aggressive jabs at premades. I didn't misconstrue anything; you tried to disingenuously backpedal your statements when that entire last line told-on you.

-You've indicated your condescension for the players that have, according to you, no skill and should get gud as an explanation for this, I've countered by saying including in this OP that I do believe that the source of such issues almost always comes from the developer and design decisions that may magnify problems (including skill differences), or create such issues. If anything, it's your interventions that seem hostile to casual players, not mine being hostile to premades.

While conveniently leaving-out the inconvenient JP playerbase's handle of the mode. I mean after all, it is easier to just blame the developers then have anybody look inwards, right? If they were getting steamrolled too, they would be suffering the same way and of course the developers would be at fault for everything. They could do everything right and the skill-disparities brought on by low-effort tomestone farmers and indifferent players would still result in "steamrolls." This is a player mentality issue first, before any design changes can fix it.

You, on the other-hand, continue to sidestep the primary cause of skill-disparity (hint: it's not role-actions being added), continuously dismiss JP behavior in the mode as to put all their focus to how western audiences participate instead as the "actual playerbase using the mode," and have such thinly-veiled contempt for premades and higher-skilled players "seal-clubbing" (while pretending not to), and think getting up on your soapbox and spouting rhetorical questions after posting a glorified blogpost is "feedback" anybody can use.

I don't think you actually know what you want, you just want to complain about lopsided matches and instead of understand the actual root causes of them, tell the developers to "fix it so that it can't happen."

I don't see this on EU much if at all. And yet EU still suffers from similar issues, which is indicative to me that the situations that you pointed as happening on your end isn't the core source of the problem since it barely happens on my end, and if you want to disagree on this, feel free to, but you're not gonna change my mind beyond pitying NA for having to deal with what you listed. It must genuinely suck.

And this is where I genuinely have a difficult time understanding what your problem with FL is so much so that you want the developer's answers. You say matches devolve into steamrolls; over in 5 minutes, and when I confirm that it is in fact a thing, but not so on JP games, you turn around and say you haven't played on NA in years and barely see such behaviors on EU. So, what? What's the entire point of this thread? Are you complaining on behalf of NA because everything you described in your opening post apparently isn't an issue on EU? You're not doing much to convince me that you're not just backpedaling after losing the proverbial plot.

The only thing you're consistently tried so far is trying to shift the subject back to strawmen, and the subject has never been about blaming premades.

No, I've contributed much more than that thus far, you just choose to ignore them to continue to argue pedantically. You keep using that word "strawman," but I don't think it means what you think it does. Quite frankly, you don't really have a subject to argue about here. You mentioning role actions here and there is not feedback. The closest thing you provided to feedback that didn't pertain to being a premade issue is your brief part about you believing it is a "tank meta" with their role actions exacerbating the meta. There's nothing "clear" about what you think you're arguing for, it takes reading all the way to post #22 to actually see a clear example. You don't even mention the word "tank" in your first post.

Edit: if you actually want to shit on premade haters or just state your disagreement with people blaming said premades for all the woes on earth, then I'd respectfully point you to that other active thread currently called "Ban Premades from Frontlines".

No, I'm fine. That thread can fade back into obscurity. Maybe your first post should have gone there instead, though, instead of making a blog-rant thread.