
Originally Posted by
Kaurhz
If the feedback were actually acknowledged and in a sensible way whilst discussing how it fits into their games direction, and not just telling people if they want compelling gameplay then they should do xyz (because they can't be bothered finding a healthy medium outside of that content), then I doubt many of the players critiquing the game would see many issues in that. However, the vast majority of the feedback has demonstrably fallen onto deaf ears, including that which is well written, discussing the positives, negatives and the impact of it.
When you spend the better part of 6-7 years providing feedback to the game, just to have it ignored, fall on deaf ears, or completely dismissed outright, then yeah, most feedback will eventually turn into anything but criticality, because seemingly they have done anything but suggest they actually care about the feedback (or that it is even being passed on), and as far as community engagement goes... Well, let's not talk about that because the only time we get it, is when we get the "I'm not annoyed at you, I am just disappointed speech" about third party tools.
If they aren't prepared to discuss it themselves, and if they aren't willing to engage with it properly then they should not be telling people to leave feedback on a forum in the first place, because this is what results in what you're seeing on the General Discussion.
But based on how confident you are, I can safely assume that you're a legacy player, and that you have read all of the feedback presented, or do you just sit on a small bunch of threads and pretend this is the only feedback that has ever been presented?