Quote Originally Posted by Granyala View Post
It doesn't need to be proven, lol.
The DEVs OBVIOUSLY do not want it right now. They may change their minds, if enough people (especially in the JP area) request it but that remains to be seen.

Allowing to dye every piece of gear would increase glamor options too and yet developers to not wish to do it. The game can handle it just fine and it is hardly more effort than setting a flag in the colorset.

Heck, they even lock the option behind high end raids, putting the dyable version out of reach for many people.

So yeah "moar glam options" is clearly not a sufficient argument for the DEVs to deviate from their design vision. Got anything else?
It is an argument, and you did not disprove it.
It does not have to be done immediately, and it does not have to be done at all.
But it still stands that "removing the gender-lock from gear would offer more glam options to players" is true, and a strong supporting argument that makes the thread OP's request valid.

What is a strong argument against it's ability to give more glam options?
Note: "those glam options are wrong to me" is not a valid argument, that is your feelings.
Note: This is not a conversation about devs or any other outside factors that neither parties actually know anything about. This is whether or not unisex clothes can benefit some players. Please stay on topic.