Quote Originally Posted by Batbrat View Post
Housing demolition exists to open up houses for other players to bid on.
It works like this.

Person wins a house.
They have their house as long as they keep playing and going in their house.
If they stop playing or stop going in their house, their house goes up for bidding again.
Now someone else wins the house, and they get to keep it for as long as they're playing and going in it.

Its a house recycle system, because they did housing SO BADLY that this is the only way other people can get a house.
"Just leave it off!" Ok, then no one else aside from everyone who already has a house will be able to get a house again. Housing becomes a 'veterans only' thing. Ok. Someone who quit years ago shouldnt have an abandoned house sitting while someone paying and playing today wants one and cant get one.

Yes we should have instance housing. We should have 40 more wards added. We should have world peace, and world hunger should be solved too.
Until they're willing to fix that, we're stuck with demolition to give other players a chance at having a house.
Its hard for me to buy the reasoning when there's entire wards dominated by a single person that they refuse to do anything about. Demolition is there to keep people hostage, I don't believe anything else at this stage.