Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1. #21
    Player
    Coombah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    1,483
    Character
    Rowan Garnet
    World
    Halicarnassus
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 90
    There are just so may unexplained things . I would just like to know how 1.0 was going to be / or what they had been working on during those 5 years.. since we are gearing toward 2.0. For Example. Ishgard is totally destroyed in 2.0 . What was it's intent in 1.0 ?(Beside not letting us in lol) Yeah I'm aware of the videos thanks for posting them but there is more than just those areas.
    (0)

  2. #22
    Player
    KaplanHomahru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    508
    Character
    Kaplan Homahru
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Red Mage Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Coombah View Post
    There are just so may unexplained things . I would just like to know how 1.0 was going to be / or what they had been working on during those 5 years.. since we are gearing toward 2.0. For Example. Ishgard is totally destroyed in 2.0 . What was it's intent in 1.0 ?(Beside not letting us in lol) Yeah I'm aware of the videos thanks for posting them but there is more than just those areas.
    http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...544#post787544
    (0)
    Last edited by KaplanHomahru; 08-19-2012 at 02:27 PM.

  3. #23
    Player
    Yves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    556
    Character
    Bubble Yum
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Goldsmith Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Rau View Post
    I'm curious as well, but I doubt we'll ever see any of it. I wonder what Tanaka was actually planning on doing with the game.
    Hopefully completing it! HIYO! <drumdrumsnare>
    (1)

  4. #24
    Player
    Coombah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    1,483
    Character
    Rowan Garnet
    World
    Halicarnassus
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by KaplanHomahru View Post
    1.0



    2.0



    Looks different from 1.0 right? What was it's purpose for 1.0.
    (1)
    Last edited by Coombah; 08-19-2012 at 02:50 PM.

  5. #25
    Player
    Yves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    556
    Character
    Bubble Yum
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Goldsmith Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Coombah View Post
    1.0



    2.0



    Looks different from 1.0 right? What was it's purpose for 1.0.
    It looks perfectly XIV launch to me: HALF FINISHED! Bwaaaahahahaahhahahaha!...get it?
    (1)

  6. #26
    Player
    Ricky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    778
    Character
    Azran Hayat
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 80
    I was just wondering this about all of those aetherial gates which had no uses
    (1)

  7. #27
    Player
    Ksenia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    1,100
    Character
    Ksenia Solo
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Weaver Lv 100
    1.0 reminds me of the Michael Jackson Jacket of the 80's. It had zippers all over it with no pockets or reason for zippers.
    (1)

  8. #28
    Player
    Bowen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    1,248
    Character
    Luca Abbot
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Coombah View Post
    2.0



    Looks different from 1.0 right? What was it's purpose for 1.0.
    That isn't Ishgard, it's a fortress of Ishgard.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fernehalwes View Post
    Hello all!

    Fernehalwes from the Localization team here.

    There's been a lot of speculation regarding the caption of one of the art assets released today, so I wanted to chime in and help try to clear things up.

    The caption in question describes the art as 破壊されたイシュガルドの要塞. This has led to translations such as 'destroyed Ishgard fortress'. The problem here is that due to the complexity of Japanese grammar, that is not the only possible interpretation.

    The following, while completely different, are both acceptable translations:

    [破壊されたイシュガルド](の要塞)
    (Fortress of) [destroyed Ishgard]

    (破壊された)[イシュガルドの要塞]
    (Destroyed) [Fortress of Ishgard]

    But wait, there's more!

    The の here can either represent the possessive, as in:

    イシュガルド[の]
    [of] Ishgard

    Or it can be used to change a noun into an adjective

    イシュガルド[の]
    Ishgard[ian]

    Considering all these things, as well as the context, probably the best representation of the original Japanese is:

    "A destroyed Ishgardian fortress."

    I hope that helps a little!
    (4)
    Last edited by Bowen; 08-19-2012 at 03:40 PM. Reason: Quoting Fern as proof.
    Quote Originally Posted by Fernehalwes View Post
    Thal's Balls! These forums are hot enough to melt an ice goddess.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3