Thread: 2.0 Grass: please change!

Originally Posted by Punainen

My point was that he had stopped contributing to the debate about the grass, and had boiled down into mere insults

You did the same thing.

Originally Posted by Punainen

he needs to provide a substantial argument toward the subject of his debate if he's going to expect to win it.

You said "u mad" which is about the worst possible argument to use on the internet.

Originally Posted by Punainen

But you stepped in and quite immediately went into the 'no substance, all insults' stance as well, and thus I was not going to dignify that with serious responses.

There was substance mixed with the insults, like a delicious cocktail.

Originally Posted by Punainen

You may have noted, that in the instances in which you DID attempt to debate the TOPIC of this thread, I also responded in kind.

Actually you tried to deflect with sarcasm:

Originally Posted by Punainen

Yes, give me lagging and low framerates! I WANT BETTER GRASS!!

Originally Posted by Punainen

Case in point, I wasn't complaining about him throwing insults, I was complaining about his use of insults and LACK OF SUBSTANCE as an attempt to win the debate.

He used both sparingly. He countered with insults when you said "U mad" like the lyrical assassin that you are.

Originally Posted by Punainen

Now, I really do hope that you have the capacity to grasp my point now that I've laid it all out for you.

Originally Posted by Punainen

And with that, I bid you adieu and good day.

I know you're reading this