What would be ideal Patch Cycle? (Long forum post)

[Dzian]

Patch cycle doesn't really matter. The issue is content longevity /relevance. Even a 1 month patch cycle wouldn't be seen as enough if the patch content could all be done and dusted in an hour or 2 of game play..

This games issue is that it has an absolute ton of content. But at the same time it has next to none. Because 99.9999% (half sarcasm) of it isn't worth doing or has been brutally trivialise by the unsanctioned system allowing players to smash years of content in minutes.

Then everyone says there bored and there's nothing to do..

The other issue is patches contain so little content that players grind the hell out of it because it's the only thing worth doing... which makes it get super old and tedious super quickly.

[CNitsah]

if we getting content like this? 1 month.
if we get content like we got before EW, 3 month.
the quality of the content is the deciding factor here

Patch cycle doesn't really matter. The issue is content longevity /relevance. Even a 1 month patch cycle wouldn't be seen as enough if the patch content could all be done and dusted in an hour or 2 of game play..

This games issue is that it has an absolute ton of content. But at the same time it has next to none. Because 99.9999% (half sarcasm) of it isn't worth doing or has been brutally trivialise by the unsanctioned system allowing players to smash years of content in minutes.

Then everyone says there bored and there's nothing to do..

The other issue is patches contain so little content that players grind the hell out of it because it's the only thing worth doing... which makes it get super old and tedious super quickly.

Was it that hard to read the first post in a ten post long thread before answering out of the subject. I swear to god, some of the forum dwellers are just answering to what they think the subject of a thread is, without even checking the first post...