Quote Originally Posted by CNitsah View Post
Lately, I've seen a lot of people claiming that the 4.5 month between patches is was the reason it feels so barren and we should go back to shorter patches. I've seen that argument repeated so much, but truthfully, this argument is sooo bad. This a perfect exemple of the community being very bad with analysing the problems.

4.5 month scheldule is not a problem. At worst, it's an aggravating factor to the real problem, the lack of content with shelf life. Give us content supposed to last for 4.5 month in your 4.5 month patch, and there won't be any problems.

Heck they could go to 3 month patches, if the patches content is the same as the 7.1 content, we'd still have the exact same problems. I mean, 7.1 was released 2 month ago, and look how happy we are. We'd feel so much better if this was 3.5 month scheldule.

No wonder SE does bad choice with the entire community seem to singlemindedly focus on a non problem instead of the actual problem.
Bro wtf ? It's SE's fault for delivering scraps on a 4.5 months basis, not the community giving feedback and SE acting wrongly on it or whatever.

Other games manage to deliver on a weekly to monthly basis with simple content that can last (ie some form of grinding usually), but this game gives you the bare minimum with little replayability. Farming mounts can only go so far, should you even care about that.