Same problem, new request

[Impia]

That is up to the developers.

The developers that would work on adding the suggestion as a feature would most likely be the same ones that added the ability to hide players under certain circumstances. It's unlikely they have anything to do if a decision to add more wards is made other than install existing code once others set up the additional server hardware. It's hard to say how much work is involved with increasing item limits but that is already work in progress so wouldn't conflict with a new suggestion where the work won't be done until already scheduled/in progress projects are completed. Perhaps they had a hand in coding the lottery but that work is long since completed.

There is no harm in the suggestion being made. It's not like SE is going to do it if they feel what potential benefit there might be is outweighed by other concerns.

Once again I would like to point out that doing this is equivalent to asking to be able to hide other player's glam choices because you don't like them. Does that really sound like a reasonable choice here? I for one work hard on my decorations, and don't really like the idea that they could just be hidden on a whim. If and when an instanced ward option were implemented, then players like AnjouMaaka would not have to concern themselves with other people's decoration choices.

[Rinoa_353]

I can agree with this when I spent several hours decorating my yards only where most people would be done with them in a matter of minutes. I love others seeing how nice my garden is and how highly decorated my homes are, for those interested seeing my homes, they are in my signature.

[Eraden]

Once again I would like to point out that doing this is equivalent to asking to be able to hide other player's glam choices because you don't like them. Does that really sound like a reasonable choice here? I for one work hard on my decorations, and don't really like the idea that they could just be hidden on a whim. If and when an instanced ward option were implemented, then players like AnjouMaaka would not have to concern themselves with other people's decoration choices.

Mao agrees. Mao nots liking stifle other peoples freedom to express themselves. Is something abouts that whats make Mao really upset. Is almost likes trying to erase person.

[LibitIncarne]

The devs are not the public
FFXIV is a game, not a theme park.
It's an issue that would have multiple benefits for some if it was to be addressed. I have zero expectation on it being addressed
Housing got a lot more than a tune up last expansion, so it's very possible for the devs to put in more than one housing update.

"Theme Park" is an MMO term. You either have a Themepark, or a Sandbox. These terms have existed since before 2.0.

This is an issue that would have one benefit for one person who doesn't want to admit that she's wrong if it was addressed.

Once again I would like to point out that doing this is equivalent to asking to be able to hide other player's glam choices because you don't like them. Does that really sound like a reasonable choice here?

Hiding glamours is a more valid idea. Now you can see the real class fantasy of this PF group's mismatched Tome and Savage gear instead of a furry convention with the other tank glammed like Ryne, and a BLM in a legacy PvP heavy armor set. (This is a joke, remove the glamour restrictions already)