Wait. Let me get the list-
- If you dislike Sena's job she did for Wuk's voice, you're transphobic.
- If you dislike Wuk Lamat as a character, you're misogynistic.
- If you dislike the song "Smile", you're racist.
Let me just pencil it in here-
- If you dislike Sena's tweets and they make you mad, you're alt-right.
Alright, got it. Anyway-
People have a right to voice their opinions about Sena's tweets, which in this thread's particular case is about the song Smile. She stated "Smile is straight up black gospel music", and people have a right to question "Why did Sena make that assumption? Because it's just expected for Black and Christian people to be associated with all music involving gospel/a choir?" She could've just said Smile is a Gospel song, or Gospel inspired, and threw "Black" in there for no reason other then to poke the hive.
To add to that, because of her assumption about the song, Sena immediately implies in the same tweet that only a "certain group" of gamers have a problem with Smile and followed it up afterwords with essentially her going "Lol why are you mad and defensive? If my statement doesn't affect you then you have no reason to be mad, right?" I hate smile, does that mean I'm in that "certain group" she is implying? If a Black players hates Smile, are they also in that group and pulling an Uncle Ruckus?
As someone put it earlier-
There was ultimately no reason for Sena to lump people who dislike the song together into one group and imply "If some players hated the song Smile, they probably only do because they're racist" and then follow it up with the insanely obvious gaslight of "Lmao Why are you people gettin mad if you're not in that group I'm talking about, huh?"
People CAN just simply dislike something and not have to have some extreme personal agenda behind it.