Dawntrail is a good Story but not a Great Story. (SPOILERS)

[Kasasagi]

So now the argument it's that it's too deep for us plebs to understand?

If you see yourself as one who skipped or ignored the story, then probably yes, but i don't say that. If you pay attantion to the story then you'll probably be surpised that its actually good and not as bad as some say.

[Swordsman]

Not the story as a whole. Parts of it, yes. Badly written, not entirely. Some parts are too long-winded, others too short. But overall the story is good.

It's somewhat true that not all parts of the story were bad, but in my honest opinion, there were significantly more bad parts of the story than there were good parts.

[Aniise]

If you see yourself as one who skipped or ignored the story, then probably yes, but i don't say that. If you pay attantion to the story then you'll probably be surpised that its actually good and not as bad as some say.

It's a very weak argument to suggest everyone who dislikes the story or parts of it is a skipper, lacks reading comprehension, or didn't pay attention. It comes off as rather arrogant if you ask me.

There are plenty of people in this forum who have gone in depth about how and why the story missed its mark with them. Maybe go and read some of the many threads that have been made about the topic and you'll see a wide range of opinions and explanations.

[Havenchild]

It's a very weak argument to suggest everyone who dislikes the story or parts of it is a skipper, lacks reading comprehension, or didn't pay attention. It comes off as rather arrogant if you ask me.
Maybe go and read some of the many threads that have been made about the topic and you'll see a wide range of opinions and explanations.

Maybe weak but it's also seemingly true. I have read many of the comments and many are disingenuous, openly admitting they skipped critical story moments (claiming something wasn't explained) or even claiming things like "Wuk Lamat should understand the culture of her people when they all live in Tuliyollal " even though we literally have a cutscene of her father saying she doesn't truly understand anything cause all she's ever experienced is the capital. So yeah there are some criticisms, fair, but then there are a hella lot more bad actors for the sake of.

Objectively looking at majority of the criticisms within the context of the story, MOST don't even make sense. That's a fact. There's a crap ton of subjective bias sprinkled throughout as well.

The most legitimate argument that has been made is the sound VA quality of all the ENG cast, that drops randomly at different points of the MSQ. Some parts where there's more of a yell or intense reaction sound muffled or you simply can't hear or the music is overshadowing the speech etc.

[Kasasagi]

It's a very weak argument to suggest everyone who dislikes the story or parts of it is a skipper, lacks reading comprehension, or didn't pay attention. It comes off as rather arrogant if you ask me.

There are plenty of people in this forum who have gone in depth about how and why the story missed its mark with them. Maybe go and read some of the many threads that have been made about the topic and you'll see a wide range of opinions and explanations.

You are right, but moste people who complain about the story did indeed skip if you belive some other people said. I did read the Posts about the Story and those who are realy worth reading and considering are few. Those people i can respect their opinion on the story.

[Palladiamors]

If you compare it to HW, ShB and EW its not good. If you compare ist to ARR and SB it is good and better.





There only should be one thread if people wouldn't be like they are.





I don't realy care. Just want to say how i see the Story.

Don't you dare compare this garbage to Stormblood.

[Kasasagi]

Don't you dare compare this garbage to Stormblood.

I dare and do you one better. It is better then Stormblood in my opinion.

[Xellith]

Which parts specifically did you like? Because I found problems with many aspects of the story and characterisation.

[Raven2014]

If you compare it to HW, ShB and EW its not good. If you compare ist to ARR and SB it is good and better.

I don't remember being even half as angry as I am with DT than I was after finishing ARR or SB.

[Kasasagi]

Which parts specifically did you like? Because I found problems with many aspects of the story and characterisation.

All the Claiments i liked for diffrent reasons. The 1st part of Shaaolani i liked very much. The story in Yak T'el was good. The Pelopelo could have been shorter and with the Hanu could have been a bit longer. The Moblin part was ok. The story with the the Yokhui was good and i hope we get more. The same goes for the Story with the Mamool Ja. Alaxandria was for the most part ineresting. Living Memory and the Endless were interesting and especialy the paart with Namika.

The death of Galool Ja Ja im neutrel. I like it from the perspektiv of japanes kulture but i understend why for us it is complicated.

The character grwoth of Wuk lamat is done better then Lyse in Stormblood. You can see evreything and how and why she lerns and gets better. It could have been longer like i said in the beginning.

I liked that Koana looked, for the 1st part, to good to be true and i got the vibe he could be the real villian.

Bakool Ja Ja's Storyarc i liked. Maybe we see more of him.

Thats more or less what i liked.

Zoraal Ja was good but only as a secondery Villain.