2 melee 2 ranged standard

[Ggwppino]

The PCT is not very mobile by default, but it allows planning margin.

And trivializing planning by comparing it to a macro category that has guaranteed uptime it's crazy.

[W00by]

I was comparing it to RDM in my post. . .? Not aiming?

[Ggwppino]

But you chose to attack the thread of the discussion from this nonsense, legitimizing it. You can have written anything you want, but it's crazy that you decided to look not at mobility, but at the tools that allow the PCT to be very mobile, after having practically trivialized its optimization.

The smn instead has problems with the drift of the buff when the fight is interrupted. The rdm has problems over long distances, we all noticed it in p7s and p8s p1, problems that it doesn't have when the mechanics don't require for this long distance. The PCT, on the other hand, will never have this problem, if, perhaps, he sacrifices some damage to use a hammer outside of burst. Maybe or maybe not. But it is, in fact, planning.

They designed better the PCT, is it a PCT fault?

[W00by]

I'm not attacking anyone. You're calling my points nonsense. That's way more of an attack. I'm just civilly disagreeing with the claim that PCT is fundamentally immobile.

Also, I fail to understand how "the tools that allow you to be mobile" and "its mobility" aren't the same thing...?

I'm the one who said casters have to plan, so obviously I'm not trivializing it. I raid on caster. At a pretty high level, too, if I do say so myself.

My point is and always has been that PCT has strong mobility tools that make it on the more mobile end of casters because of their flexibility. If you can disprove that PCT is mobile in the hands of a good player, feel free. But I'd appreciate not being called nonsense with no founding. And if you read my other posts, you'd know I said that PCT is really well designed. But it's really well designed ... and mobile. At the same time. Two things can be true.