The range of the aim of this post is going for savage raiders and msq enjoyers alike. It doesn't make sense. Did you mean 'casually toxic' instead OP? There are extremely well written posts on this forum criticising Dawntrail which actually lead into 'Wuk Lamat bad' so again, that doesn't make sense.

Also does casually toxic include people who are defending Dawntrail using arguments such as: "it is the beginning, it's OK for it to be bad"; "the devs worked hard on this, stop complaining" and the likes of: "ARR and Stormblood existed so that cancels out Dawntrail beinfg bad" because none of these are structured arguments in defence of the expansion. They are a cry and self deflection, finger waving, self victimising statements that showcase the persons lack of ability to prop up a proper argument back. So instead they opt to treat the critics as bad people treating a game unfairly and creating a bad atmosphere for the playerbase. Does this not also count as toxic?