Results -9 to 0 of 442

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Turtledeluxe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2023
    Posts
    1,267
    Character
    Kinda Hungry
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Black Mage Lv 100
    Accusing the cast of moral insufficiency requires some kind of argument aside from murder. Killing is just a word. I killed my chances. I killed you in Tekken. Killing is an excitable term that doesn't come equipped with gravity.

    You also can't argue that something simply existing means it couldn't or shouldn't be ended. If that were the case, our justice system would be very different and arguably less effective. What's morally problematic is arguing that simple sentience means endings aren't on the table.


    This kind of thinking also makes me think about the actors' strike and their protections. What are we supposed to tell them? Oh sorry, this AI can take new dialogue and speak just like you. You'll need to forfeit all your rights and employment to this AI..sorry. it's not 1:1 because the argument doesn't hinge on sentience buuut.
    (2)
    Last edited by Turtledeluxe; 08-23-2024 at 04:37 AM.

Tags for this Thread