Hello all,
I have noticed that a lot of the criticism of Viper--those coming out in support of the announced changes--have almost nothing to say about Viper itself. The vast majority of the discussion surrounding the changes seems to be regarding the mere existence of positionals.
I will admit that i have not read every single page of every single thread and the hundreds of responses therein, but I have read dozens and dozens of them. Thus far, I haven't read any specific criticism of Viper's current rotation or playstyle. I haven't read any responses saying "Viper's APM is too high" or "It's too hard to hit both oGCDs while moving from Hunter's Coil to Swiftskin's Coil".
All the criticism I have seen can be summarized by these three comments I found across the various threads. Please excuse my paraphrasing:
1. "I am a tank main, and melee DPS has a flow that is too different for me to enjoy. Positionals are a key part of this."
2. "Missing a positional feels bad, so I'd rather them not exist and take a DPS loss instead." (Which, I feel obligated to note, is what happens if you ignore them and pretend they don't exist.)
3. "Because some wall bosses exist, and wall bosses do not require positioning to execute positionals, then positionals should not exist in any content under any circumstances."
None of these criticisms have anything to do with Viper and with whether or not Viper should be changed. They are part of an overarching discussion on the existence of positionals within the game, and whether or not positionals should exist; Viper is simply being used as an outlet for these players to criticize a gameplay element they do not want to engage with.
On that note -- engaging or not engaging with positionals -- I would like to refer everyone to the following image. I've been doing my best not to be pedantic, but this is what it has come to:
https://i.imgur.com/ZG8FQtM.png
And, keeping that image fresh in mind, I'd like to point out that maximum damage, not decent/respectable/passable damage, is the key tenant of positionals. If that continues to be a problem, or not understood, then I'd like to refer continuing critics of positionals to one of the following four images instead:
https://i.imgur.com/XnShC5m.png
https://i.imgur.com/sShdOEo.png
https://i.imgur.com/0B7Qtn9.png
https://i.imgur.com/FJNKFbk.png