Wow, Wuk Lamat is really single-handedly ruining the DT story...

[Dogempire]

The first choice pissed me off the most considering it was a case of "honor before reason" as her plan didn't even dissuade Zoraal Ja from sending in his army like she had been intending, at which point I was going "Can you please just let me kill this guy now.".

It also doesn't make sense because in the same scene Wuk Lamat is confident that Koana had a plan to deal with the army of robots.

Like, if you were that confident in Koana then why didn't you let us jump him? We'd literally destroy his regulator or whatever it's called in 1 GCD and then end him forever in the next.

Oh wait, forgot, we need a villain to fight for the level 99 trial and Zoraal Ja is the most obvious option, better let him retreat and power up to be a notable threat.

[Dogempire]

Not sure what you are implying, both are dislikable characters to me. But at least I get to kill Valens and be rid of him, Wuk will forever be here to annoy me unless the writers have the guts to kill their own pet. So yes, I hate Wuk more than Valens

Pretty sure he's a troll or just a moron, probably both. There are a lot of those on this forums and it's better to not engage with them.

Adding to this though, at least Valens had a funny memeworthy death since he was trying to google how to block the attack before Gaius killed him. That definitely made me hate him a little less.

The only thing we got for Wookie was "killing" her in the play, which thank yaoi she was the one that lost, because I would hate her a decent bit more if we had to play dead for her in that play.

[AmorfaVex]

I'd rather have no dialogue options than three different ways to say yes.

[Reimmi]

So a child abuser is better than an "annoying" character for you?

Guess we know where your interests lie.

One is dead, the other one will be annoying us for the entire expansion

[ThorneDynasty]

Pretty sure he's a troll

I hope so, else what are we doing here even, explaining to a presumably adult human being what fiction is?

[AnnRam]

Wuk Lamant is the best character that SE have developed since the FIRST FF.

I truly hope she gets an entire expansion just for herself, because in DT we didn't see her enough.

[Voidmage]

The only thing we got for Wookie was "killing" her in the play, which thank yaoi she was the one that lost, because I would hate her a decent bit more if we had to play dead for her in that play.

And even then she gets up and steals the show.

Imagine a stageplay were the invading army stands up and sings about peace and friendship.

Even as the “enemy” she is the beloved one.
At that cringe point I WANTED to drop dead.

[GartredZW]

I feel bad for the Alisaie fans who are currently coping that their favorite character did literally nothing this expansion other than repeatedly simp for Wuk; every line of dialogue she has is her going "POOCHIE WUK LAMAT IS ONE OUTRAGEOUS DUDE, SHE'S TOTALLY IN MY FACE" and going "Where's Wuk Lamat?" whenever Wuk is not on screen, it's like she got tempered just instead of by a primal she got tempered by Wuk

At least we got confirmation that she also calls G'raha "Raha" while still saying "Y'Shtola"
That at least fuels my shipping.

[Karkarov]

I'd rather have no dialogue options than three different ways to say yes.

Yeah this kinda hits the nail on the head for what is wrong with MSQ in this expansion.

[NiceNox]

So a child abuser is better than an "annoying" character for you?

Guess we know where your interests lie.

People should understand that by liking one specific character, it doesn't mean that one is aspired to be like them. You can like the worst or the most despicable character because of the motive, writing, and execution of the character. Just because one likes Valens doesn't mean that the individual is about to abuse children and turn them into war machines, it maybe because the writing of the character is so good and well written that it makes the players both love and despite such character (Ex. Asahi)