Quote Originally Posted by ThomasOfEger View Post
Thus, anyone who ignores some set written rule for the outcome of the discussion I've tried to have here ends up proving interesting values in their own right. Ignorance at a high level. Don't forget to add afterwards that it's my fault I can't debate. I'm laughing at you wasting your time and making yourself ....ehm... by commenting on something that was clearly stated in the thread.
I am glad you realize where the fault. Just look at the common factor with the below points.

- You tried to limit the discussion around tvery specific parameters, which largely only aims to serve an "agree with me" purpose.
- You were more concerned in trying to condescend those in the thread for not indulging in your limiting parameters.
- You were more concerned with trying to engage in meta-discussion around your topic.
- You are conflating intelligence and reading comprehension with a deliberate act of ignoring those rules.

You're laughing at the fact you have not made the distinction between poor reading comprehension and a deliberate act of ignoring your fictitious meta-discussion rules? OK.