Results 1 to 10 of 21

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Jojoya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    9,091
    Character
    Jojoya Joya
    World
    Coeurl
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by ThomasOfEger View Post
    It was to be expected that there would be someone whose intelligence falls short of understanding the written text. No one in the post wanted to rate the players in any way so that they could argue who was better or not. That's why I wanted to start this discussion about how it could be done with Rating and look for ways to implement it, not reasons why it couldn't be done. Thus the door from this thread is near the header and goodbye.
    Unfortunately for you, this is Square Enix's forum and not yours. You do not get to dictate who can and who can't participate in a thread.
    (1)

  2. #2
    Player
    ThomasOfEger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    72
    Character
    Thurinor Istor
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 90
    Thus, anyone who ignores some set written rule for the outcome of the discussion I've tried to have here ends up proving interesting values in their own right. Ignorance at a high level. Don't forget to add afterwards that it's my fault I can't debate. I'm laughing at you wasting your time and making yourself ....ehm... by commenting on something that was clearly stated in the thread.
    (0)

  3. #3
    Player
    Kaurhz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    3,586
    Character
    Asuka Kirai
    World
    Sagittarius
    Main Class
    Dancer Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by ThomasOfEger View Post
    Thus, anyone who ignores some set written rule for the outcome of the discussion I've tried to have here ends up proving interesting values in their own right. Ignorance at a high level. Don't forget to add afterwards that it's my fault I can't debate. I'm laughing at you wasting your time and making yourself ....ehm... by commenting on something that was clearly stated in the thread.
    I am glad you realize where the fault. Just look at the common factor with the below points.

    - You tried to limit the discussion around tvery specific parameters, which largely only aims to serve an "agree with me" purpose.
    - You were more concerned in trying to condescend those in the thread for not indulging in your limiting parameters.
    - You were more concerned with trying to engage in meta-discussion around your topic.
    - You are conflating intelligence and reading comprehension with a deliberate act of ignoring those rules.

    You're laughing at the fact you have not made the distinction between poor reading comprehension and a deliberate act of ignoring your fictitious meta-discussion rules? OK.
    (0)