#FFXIVHEALERSTRIKE

[Turtledeluxe]

You can Google it right?

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/the-ratio-ratioed

https://www.dataforprogress.org/the-ratio-richter-scale

https://www.howtogeek.com/721651/wha...-social-media/

1. None of the sources in know your meme are using the term "ratio'd". It's a very specific and modern term used commonly on x.com and it has nothing to do with replies. I already sourced it with a link.

2. Same issue

3. Have nothing to do with x.com

The user said "that's the definition of being ratio'd". Sorry but take your L.

If you go to x.com right now and search the word, numerous examples will come up showing that people are talking about tweets where the reply has more likes than the tweet it is responding to.

[TaleraRistain]

1. None of the sources in know your meme are using the term "ratio'd". It's a very specific and modern term used commonly on x.com and it has nothing to do with replies. I already sourced it with a link.

2. Same issue

3. Have nothing to do with x.com

1. The Ratio or Ratioed refers to an unofficial Twitter law which states that if the amount of replies to a tweet greatly outnumbers the number of retweets and likes, then the tweet is bad.

2. One simple, popular way to measure the quality of a tweet is its Ratio -- the number of replies divided by the number of favorites (or, in the ever fluid language of Twitter, likes) it receives.

3. The term "ratio" was likely coined around 2017, although its exact origin is unknown. However, one of the big reasons it took off was an article from Esquire discussing the importance of "The Ratio" on Twitter.

I don't know if you're just trying to be deliberately obtuse or what but nobody who actually frequents Twitter on a regular basis calls it X.

[Turtledeluxe]

1. The Ratio or Ratioed refers to an unofficial Twitter law which states that if the amount of replies to a tweet greatly outnumbers the number of retweets and likes, then the tweet is bad.

2. One simple, popular way to measure the quality of a tweet is its Ratio -- the number of replies divided by the number of favorites (or, in the ever fluid language of Twitter, likes) it receives.

3. The term "ratio" was likely coined around 2017, although its exact origin is unknown. However, one of the big reasons it took off was an article from Esquire discussing the importance of "The Ratio" on Twitter.

I don't know if you're just trying to be deliberately obtuse or what but nobody who actually frequents Twitter on a regular basis calls it X.

The user said "ratio'd" it's specific slang and you're wrong.

My original post about it had over 10 likes last time I checked. Call me when yours does. It's common knowledge. I don't like to be dismissive but you're arguing something you have no idea about.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/defi...atio%E2%80%99d

It is not "ratio" nor "ratioed"

https://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/...=1#post6494993

Actually it has 24. So yeah I'm not sure what to tell you. Just for posterity here is the term he used:

[

about 350 likes on the main post.
about 4750 posts.

that feels like the definition of being ratio'd if I ever saw one.

There are legitimate criticism about healing in this game but this.... whatever this is ain't it guys.

[Aword3213]

There's quite a few who have decided they can't stand that there's even one single positive thread about healing on the forums, and have felt the need to invade it and make passive-aggressive and snarky comments about people enjoying healing. I'd definitely see that as griefing.

It’s ironic that you always see it as your sacred duty to be the representative of the silent majority and bring “majority in game vs minority forum” argument to Every. Single. Thread made with criticism and discussion in mind.

You yourself fit your definition of griefing rather perfectly

[Laerune]

What happend to the likes on OP post, it was 465 likes and now its 355

Sign that supporters of the strike are walking back on what they were going to do?

[Rein_eon_Osborne]

[…]Pesonally, I'm of the opinion that the game should slowly ramp up in difficulty while offering support for players to improve at their jobs. Not knowing the basics by 80+ is stupid. I don't mind that people want to treat FFXIV as a single player game but, even on easy mode, even most single player RPGs I've encountered required at least some level of competency to get through.

It’s a conundrum, yeah. It’s why I believe having more fail states than we currently have at the moment would’ve been healthier—by that I mean, introduce them gradually. Let players build that resilience against frustration. It’s good for them as a player in long run. Let them grow; let them learn; let them fail; let them relearn, they’ll come out better.

Lack of such resilience compounded by how watered down the jobs are made us focus incessantly i.e. over minor 1-3 dps losses because.. what else there left to focus on? Everything becomes black & white. Encounter design in return cannot account for the in-between, they just straight up become a one shotting galore.

[Venarius]

I'll be striking by playing WHM but without any heals on my hotbar. No one can blame me for playing my three button DPS class like SE intended to.

[rawker]

What happend to the likes on OP post, it was 465 likes and now its 355

Sign that supporters of the strike are walking back on what they were going to do?

Considering your previous interactions on this thread was rather... interesting, to say the least, I am greatly suspicious of the intent of this reply. For someone who believed that the movement will not prosper and that devs will simply ignore, you have paid more attention to the number of likes this thread has garnered. Truly interesting for someone such as myself who supports the strike but didn't bother tracking the number of likes.

[Supersnow845]

I’ve long since stopped looking at how many likes are on Gemina’s post (hell I don’t know if I have actually liked it myself) for me the strike has already achieved everything I want it to achieve

If this much attention ends up achieving nothing I can be safe in the knowledge that me soapboxing in the healer forums truly is pointless so I can finally abandon this trash fire of a role without feeling bad about it

[Rein_eon_Osborne]

Considering your previous interactions on this thread was rather... interesting, to say the least, I am greatly suspicious of the intent of this reply. For someone who believed that the movement will not prosper and that devs will simply ignore, you have paid more attention to the number of likes this thread has garnered. Truly interesting for someone such as myself who supports the strike but didn't bother tracking the number of likes.

Did the post even get over 400+ likes, or is it people misconstruing between OP upvote count vs thread page count?