Results 1 to 10 of 11398

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Ramiee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2022
    Location
    Uldah
    Posts
    1,096
    Character
    Grainne Gothram
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Black Mage Lv 50
    I said it before and I'll say it again.
    The only reasons people are against this strike is because you're scared of long queue times because you don't play the bad role.
    (13)

  2. #2
    Player
    TBerry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    443
    Character
    Jote Nuidaire
    World
    Omega
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Ramiee View Post
    I said it before and I'll say it again.
    The only reasons people are against this strike is because you're scared of long queue times because you don't play the bad role.
    Why would they? Unrestricted/unsynced and trusts still exist.
    (2)

  3. #3
    Player
    KitiaraIornsight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    134
    Character
    Kitiara Utmatar
    World
    Famfrit
    Main Class
    Sage Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Ramiee View Post
    The only reasons people are against this strike is because you're scared of long queue times because you don't play the bad role.
    That's funny.
    Sage is my most played job. I queue almost all dailies as a sage. I'm against it not because of this, because you are in fact a minority. I know a ton of healer mains that think this strike is just as silly as I do, and I can say "thanks for even faster insta queues for trials during DT." DS MAKES THIS WHOLE THING INVALID. Almost every dps is not going to sit and wait in a 30 min long queue during launch. They will be using the duty support trust system, so how is your strike going to do anything there. Japan players are happy with the overall state of healer as is the majority of the NA/EU region, if you go to the FF14 subreddit, this whole thread is mainly getting mocked on. When you go to FB and the few articles covering this by game sites, the majority of people are like "huh, there is a strike? i heal and that's silly" and do you know why? The vast majority of the player base DON'T frequent these forums. I've been playing this game on this account since 2.1 and I had a beta account as well. And I RARELY come to the forums unless a specific post, like this gets any kind of traction because of the majority of people here I find think they are the end all be all experts of this game. The vast majority of players use discord or reddit to discuss the game, not here. So yes, I am absolutely confident when I say this strike is nothing but a vocal minority.
    Everyone is free to speak up sure. But the fact so many of you are "you don't' agree with me, so therefore its bordering harassment because someone said maybe I should unsub." Well those of you who hate the way healers are now, you have 2 options, play another job and let the majority of us that do enjoy healers as they stand now keep enjoying it, or unsub. But you also have to accept that the likelihood of anything drastically changing with healer roles anytime soon is slim to none. The fact is, healers all do get some more damage attacks this expansion. those have been showcased and are being ignored by those weeping and gnashing teeth. No ONE is scared of long queue times because guess what, SE fixed that with the trust system, and they even showed trust works in 8 man with the Hydalen trial.... and its likely we will see more of that implemented as time goes on. So what exactly do you think you are going to accomplish? If the majority of players are happy globally a few people "striking' with a non-effective strike is not going to catch SE's attention, even if the forum post gets large. I mean the spin off posts on here already are ridiculous with accusations that streamers should be held to some sort of journalism standard when they are just players of the game and everything they say is just their personal opinion and commentary. This whole thing is becoming quite the joke outside of these forums.
    (3)