#FFXIVHEALERSTRIKE

[Rolder50]

Is it possible to play content without tanks or healers? It could theoretically be possible to do content with just dps if we can manage to outdamage everything before we die. Though, there is more damage in DT so I'm not entirely sure what DPS composition would work if at all for this.

All DPS probably not. You could do regular dungeons with 1 tank 3 dps no healer, and you could do ex/savage/ultimate if you are really good, with just one healer rather then two.

You can do 8 man content with no healer technically, but you're group needs to be real good and it's more of a challenge run then something that could ever feasibly be common

[Supersnow845]

Careful they have a discord and will mass report you to get you banned from the forums. Contrary opinions are not welcome here, which is a big part of why I won't support his movement. So far those in charge have just been down right rude and nasty to anyone who has disagreed with them. Added all of them to a forum ignore and really wish that extended to black list in the game at this point.

The discord has literally never mass reported anyone

What is it with people throwing out baseless “they are all toxic” claims while being incredibly toxic themselves

[TheDustyOne]

The discord has literally never mass reported anyone

What is it with people throwing out baseless “they are all toxic” claims while being incredibly toxic themselves

Because why engage with counterpoints when they could just poison the well instead?

Between the accusations of mass reports against dissenting opinions (no evidence for this by the way) and people claiming to support the strike by being a menace in DF (the fact they queued for DF with randoms as a healer already means they aren't striking), people just want to stir up trouble without actually looking into things themselves.

Why think for yourself when you could just parrot your favourite content creator? Why concede that maybe the strike has a point when you could just poison the well? Why would you be civil and say "I merely disagree and find the healers fine" when you could say "I think you guys are embarrassing / hilarious / stupid / childish / casual / no-lifers" and then wonder why people think you're toxic?

[EusisLandale]

just remember that the main way to strike is to not play healer in the first place. If they're qued into a dungeon with randoms, they're not striking.

Good thing I never said I was doing it then, huh? I've switched back to primarily tanking, sure, but if a friend needs a healer a friend needs a healer and you can piss off if you've got a problem with it.

[TheDustyOne]

Good thing I never said I was doing it then, huh? I've switched back to primarily tanking, sure, but if a friend needs a healer a friend needs a healer and you can piss off if you've got a problem with it.

Good for you? No one said you were obligated to strike if you don't mind playing the healers, so the "piss off if you've got a problem with it" is incredibly unwarranted, especially since Olivia was talking about people griefing in content.

[EusisLandale]

especially since Olivia was talking about people griefing in content.

I see nothing linking her statement to that. It did, however, immediately follow up on me mentioning healing despite the fact that I have generally been pretty supportive of this whole thing.

[TheDustyOne]

I see nothing linking her statement to that. It did, however, immediately follow up on me mentioning healing despite the fact that I have generally been pretty supportive of this whole thing.

These quotes;

apparently there are healer queueing as healer but then dont heal the tank (yeah, some random tanks, they dont care if its a sprout). and then when the tank dies they write something about healer strike.

thats just greifing and they should and deserve to be reported.

just remember that the main way to strike is to not play healer in the first place. If they're qued into a dungeon with randoms, they're not striking.

[EusisLandale]

These quotes;

Quotes that were not quoted by said person. Yes, of course, I'm just supposed to assume they're all related.

[TheDustyOne]

Considering they were only just said a page ago and were more or less in relation to "people are griefing with the strike", context should be enough. What made you think Olivia was referring to you when what Olivia said better fit the context of people griefing in Duty Finder? The end result still involved going up to someone who ultimately didn't do anything to you and telling them to "piss off".

[EusisLandale]

Considering they were only just said a page ago and were more or less in relation to "people are griefing with the strike", context should be enough. What made you think Olivia was referring to you when what Olivia said better fit the context of people griefing in Duty Finder? The end result still involved going up to someone who ultimately didn't do anything to you and telling them to "piss off".

Makes no attempt to link themselves to the previous topic. Immediately follows up on two different people talking about having healed with telling people striking means no healing. Gee, I really do wonder which thing that was supposed to obviously be connected to.