#FFXIVHEALERSTRIKE

[EusisLandale]

Well one, the use of "they" instead of "you" likely means they're referring to someone indirectly, and not to the person just above, and two, the fact Olivias statement makes more sense in context of people griefing.

No. It honestly looks more connected to me and the other guy. It talks about not healing, and not going in with random people. It says nothing about the griefing. You're getting quite obnoxious now, so I'll be ignoring you. Have a good night.

[Saraide]

No. It honestly looks more connected to me and the other guy. It talks about not healing, and not going in with random people. It says nothing about the griefing. You're getting quite obnoxious now, so I'll be ignoring you. Have a good night.

It really doesnt look like it's connected to you imo. Still if you feel like someone is talking about you without mentioning you, you could always try to explore if they could have meant someone else instead. In this case it will lead you to a very reasonable assumption that the post was in relation to some other posts one of which is even still on the same page.

[Aravell]

Why think for yourself when you could just parrot your favourite content creator? Why concede that maybe the strike has a point when you could just poison the well? Why would you be civil and say "I merely disagree and find the healers fine" when you could say "I think you guys are embarrassing / hilarious / stupid / childish / casual / no-lifers" and then wonder why people think you're toxic?

This wonderful community has a very nice group of people that go into a criticism thread and immediately call everyone there a pathetic echo chamber of negativity and then they wonder why people think they're very unpleasant.

What an amazing community we have here on the forums.

[TheDustyOne]

This wonderful community has a very nice group of people that go into a criticism thread and immediately call everyone there a pathetic echo chamber of negativity and then they wonder why people think they're very unpleasant.

What an amazing community we have here on the forums.

I know, or jumping in and taking offence at someone that wasn't talking about them to begin with for that matter. Reading comprehension would help out a lot.

[Aravell]

Sis, do you need a ladder for how far you're reaching? None of this has ever happened. The worst I've seen in this entire thread is people getting a little snarky.

As a group grows bigger, it becomes harder and harder to account for the actions of everyone, so that's the easiest tactic to discredit the strike now.

"Someone from your discord is doing bad things! What's that? Where's my evidence? Well, you can't prove that none of you did what I said, can you? Guilty until proven innocent!"

That appears to be the main tactic now, along with griefers claiming the hashtag.

[Reinha]

I just find it funny that the people who were supposed to take our place as healers and make the strike irrelevant end up griefing parties out of bitterness instead of enjoying healing like they said they would. Although I suppose most of them did only say how they were going to like the instant queues without any mention of liking gameplay.

[HealerGuy]

I don't find it funny that the people who are part of the Healers Strike are going out of their way to grief people. Disgusting behavior IMO.

[Silver-Strider]

I don't find it funny that the people who are part of the Healers Strike are going out of their way to grief people. Disgusting behavior IMO.

Grief how? By providing a counter argument to your post? That's a discussion.

[Connor]

Don’t feed the troll, guys. They’re fat enough as-is from how well they’ve eaten.

(metaphorically not physically)

[HealerGuy]

Don’t feed the troll, guys. They’re fat enough as-is from how well they’ve eaten.

(metaphorically not physically)

Everyone who disagrees with you is a troll. Got it.