#FFXIVHEALERSTRIKE

[Striker44]

As far as I know, none of the people seriously supporting the strike regard griefing or harassment as practical methods of issuing feedback.

There's quite a few who have decided they can't stand that there's even one single positive thread about healing on the forums, and have felt the need to invade it and make passive-aggressive and snarky comments about people enjoying healing. I'd definitely see that as griefing.

[Rolder50]

There's quite a few who have decided they can't stand that there's even one single positive thread about healing on the forums, and have felt the need to invade it and make passive-aggressive and snarky comments about people enjoying healing. I'd definitely see that as griefing.

> Citation Needed

[PercibelTheren]

> Citation Needed

There are indeed some snarky comments in some of the threads but I honestly fail to see how different that is from Striker's usual white knighting and being contrarian when there's any negative feedback.

[Turtledeluxe]

There's quite a few who have decided they can't stand that there's even one single positive thread about healing on the forums, and have felt the need to invade it and make passive-aggressive and snarky comments about people enjoying healing. I'd definitely see that as griefing.

I wasn't aware griefing referred to forums. Griefing typically refers to in game actions.

[Bellsong]

There's quite a few who have decided they can't stand that there's even one single positive thread about healing on the forums, and have felt the need to invade it and make passive-aggressive and snarky comments about people enjoying healing. I'd definitely see that as griefing.

There's quite a few who have decided they can't stand that there's even one single negative thread about healing on the forums, and have felt the need to invade it and make passive-aggressive and snarky comments about people concerned about the state of healing. I'd definitely see that as griefing.

[Hurri-DB]

I hope that we get more unavoidable damage.

[Ramiee]

about 350 likes on the main post.
about 4750 posts.

that feels like the definition of being ratio'd if I ever saw one.

Applying twitter ratios to an old school forum as an argument is probably the funniest attempt at insulting the strike I have see and trust me there has been some real competition.

[Turtledeluxe]

Applying twitter ratios to an old school forum as an argument is probably the funniest attempt at insulting the strike I have see and trust me there has been some real competition.

Except it's not a Twitter ratio. It's a ratio of posts to likes on the OG post. A Twitter ratio is a comparison of likes between two posts. So it actually fails in general, to be funny or informative. It's a very misleading post.

Many strike critics, from the most inexperienced to the most experienced players, don't seem well suited to countering the strike. They rely on emotional ranting, personal attacks, or straight up distortions..

[Ramiee]

There's quite a few who have decided they can't stand that there's even one single positive thread about healing on the forums, and have felt the need to invade it and make passive-aggressive and snarky comments about people enjoying healing. I'd definitely see that as griefing.

If you go into the healer sub section you find positive posts about healing and non-hostile discussions. But let's be real posting in the general forums "look at how good healing is" is purely to bait this thread or argue against it. People who want actual discussions about healers would go to the healer section same with DPS and tanks.

[Ramiee]

> Citation Needed

Nah it happened. I know cus I was one of the ones who did it lol. I kinda enjoy stirring the pot