I do agree that the rules can be relaxed on emptier wards. Owning a house on a mostly-vacant ward should, reasonably, suspend enforcement of the Housing Exclusion Principle.If a player has a house on a dead server and a popular server and has to delete one of them, they are going to give up the one on a dead server. Here's a recent example of this player mentality. When players are forced to make a choice, most players will choose to own a house on a big server, and the minority who don't, already have a house on a dead server and you don't want them to own more. All this restriction would do is free up houses that no one wants to buy.
Why would it matter if a house people don't want to buy and decorate is taken by someone who uses it for their own gain in a way that doesn't impact you? It's pointless to ask I guess. No one ever answers that question in good faith and neither will you.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.


Reply With Quote

