Updated benchmark

[CidHeiral]

Why's that?

There are subtle differences between the old and new examples in that post but to say one is "unrecognizable" as the other is absolutely ridiculous.

Not to mention that style of feedback is useless to the devs. "It feels off" or "it doesn't look right" isn't actionable feedback. "My eyes used to curve downward and now they curve upward, here's a zoomed in picture of what I'm talking about" is actionable feedback. You need to break down exactly what you feel is wrong if you want a realistic chance of it being addressed.

Prosopagnosia probably.

Using a disability as an insult over slightly different video game pixels. Yikes.

[SchwarzwaelderTorte]

Not to mention that style of feedback is useless to the devs. "It feels off" or "it doesn't look right" isn't actionable feedback. "My eyes used to curve downward and now they curve upward, here's a zoomed in picture of what I'm talking about" is actionable feedback. You need to break down exactly what you feel is wrong if you want a realistic chance of it being addressed.

To add to that, cropping screenshots to focus on specific parts would also help a lot with comparing things.
If you just put two screenshots of whole faces as they are there's a high chance that people who are not intimately familiar with your character will not be as sensible to the differences as you are, and so to them it virtually "looks the same".
But if you focus their attention on say the eyes, the mouth, etc, by properly framing them, it's already more likely that they'll see the differences, because they're not distracted by everything else.
(and by "people" and "they" I mean both the people posting here and whatever official entity who might or might not be reading these threads)