Quote Originally Posted by noumen0nn View Post
Because we as players have no solid way of knowing which changes are """necessary""", and which are a result of oversight/error/not getting around to it yet/etc, and if we're unhappy with what we see it's better to say something on the chance that its the latter. If we're wrong and its the former, SE artists and devs already know that and can just move to the next bit of feedback. Nor can you convince me that subtle changes to the shape of facial features are needed to make them fit the new rigs, given that the existing eye/nose/mouth/face options are quite different from one another yet can all use the exact same rig no problem.

In any case, saying nothing is the best way to guarantee that nothing will change. The only thing that could be less useful than not giving feedback, is complaining about people who do. We aren't the ones who are obsessed.
Feedback is always good.
And it's true, we don't what changes are necessary or the result of errors. Like the Moonkeeper fangs and Lalafell teeth.
But when will people consider when a change is a necessary one? A month after DT launch? A year?
Where to draw the line when the feedback is based on functional model appearances or simply personal preferences?