Forced aesthetic changes should not exist

[Turtledeluxe]

[Thing happens that people do not like & would rather avoid] -> [cannot avoid thing] -> [The fact that the thing cannot be avoided feels bad] => "I don't like being forced to do this"
The intent of the devs thinking people would like it is nice and all, but intent does not define people's experiences in practice, and people communicating that they feel like they lack agency in situations like this is VERY good feedback for those creating interactive media.

That is the significance of the "forced" aspect in this. Optional toggles are the ideal solution, but ceasing their implementation and adding more options later is also seen as a solution for those affected. Finding a solution that is a good compromise between people who like the feature and those who do not is why discussion boards exist '3'

Yeah, that's why I said I agree and everything. And it's hard to explain because we use inflammatory language pretty casually all the time I guess. "Hijacking, forcing, etc". It just gets weird for me on this particular subject. But that's just me.

And I do realize the transformations are part of the action, to be clear. I'm not disputing that. Devs do miss the mark on certain things, that's true. I'm not sure how that's relevant (to implying they're forcing something).

It really is fair as well because people can do whatever they want. I was just curious, like I said.