Hey investors of the AI sector: Refuting points with things like 'that's what feedback is for' when you know very well that feedback would not effect systems that deteriorate the enjoyment of the product if the entire product is mishandled by over indulging in the systems deacribed js pseudo-intellectualism, you need to study more.

The idea is that the less a human mind tackles what'a going on the less a human mind will seek relation or enjoyment. I didn't think you were dull enough to escape the idea that this game is very art heavy.

Go back to your competitor forum or cheek some more bitcoin strongarming into people unknowing.

With that being said there is no conspiracy here to be bashing. I'm certain all of you overfilter your selfies . There is genuinely no enjoyment to behold in one specific, super-franchise that competes with this game and it's due to the large allocation of completely AI maintained generation. It's nkt a very immersive World and the Craft and War aspect of it are like copy-pasting what was likely perceived by AI scrapers as popular mechanics of genre: MMORPG. I'd hate to see that happen here. Inspiration is one thing but a keen acuity can discern between what was designed and automated.

Automation should exist but not be the entirety.

The funny gif of the drone weapon compared to the human is true, electricity hurts so something maintained by it to hurt will hurt more. Imagine that.