Feelings on FF14's Trinity System?

[Truen]

I like the trinity. However, I think the problem is in an effort to keep this narrow there's been way too much homogonization and jobs feel rather samey in the healer space. Back when Astros were buffing healers /w a blend of dots and DD, White mages were big healers /w strong DDs, and Scholars were dotting, shield casting healers with some DDs and heals the game was both interesting and fun! Now, what they've created is a shadow of what we once had and it's not improving.

[Eraden]

Mao thinkings would be good to has DPS need manage thems aggros more often and maybe also make tanks need to work bits harder to keeps aggro off DPS and Healers. Rights now Mao can go "balls-to-the-walls" as BLMs and never need worries. Mao thinkings this makes Mao job maybe little bits too easy. Buts with this change everyones would also need to has ways to track aggro betters and fights might need be adjusted for this. DPS checks would still be needed for hard fights but in some cases mights need be toned down little bits.

[Zairava]

Mao thinkings would be good to has DPS need manage thems aggros more often and maybe also make tanks need to work bits harder to keeps aggro off DPS and Healers. Rights now Mao can go "balls-to-the-walls" as BLMs and never need worries. Mao thinkings this makes Mao job maybe little bits too easy. Buts with this change everyones would also need to has ways to track aggro betters and fights might need be adjusted for this. DPS checks would still be needed for hard fights but in some cases mights need be toned down little bits.

It actually used to be like this.

Tanks had an enmity combo and a proper tank stance, not what could be referred to as enmity stance since the start of Shadowbringers.

Dps had Diversion and healers had lucid dreaming to reduce aggro generation, ninja even had buttons that interacted with aggro and were invaluable because of it.

While I personally enjoyed it more like it was before Shadowbringers, I don't ever see us going back. I'm sure it could be implemented better, but I don't think it's remotely on their radar or interest.

[ty_taurus]

Mao thinkings would be good to has DPS need manage thems aggros more often and maybe also make tanks need to work bits harder to keeps aggro off DPS and Healers. Rights now Mao can go "balls-to-the-walls" as BLMs and never need worries. Mao thinkings this makes Mao job maybe little bits too easy. Buts with this change everyones would also need to has ways to track aggro betters and fights might need be adjusted for this. DPS checks would still be needed for hard fights but in some cases mights need be toned down little bits.

Personally, I don’t think DPS and healers are the ones who needed to manage their aggro generation. I’d rather tanks get aggro management back, but it be something they handle themselves in more interactive ways than just “tank stance ON” and provoke/shirk. Imagine, for example, a reworked Divine Veil for Paladin that looks something like this:

Grants a buff to self and nearby party members for 15 seconds. Restores HP to target with a potency of 200 when target recovers HP; this effect can only trigger once per 3 seconds. Additionally, you receive 150% of enmity generated from healing on the target.

In other words, rather than directly competing with a healer’s healing, it adds additional healing when your healer heals, takes all the aggro they would generate for that healing and multiplies it.

Tanks could instead of having tank stance, have more effects like this that allow them to manage their aggro in ways that are more unique to different situations. Along with having some standard ways of managing aggro too of course.

Also, it would be cool if tanks had front positionals.

[Zairava]

Personally, I don’t think DPS and healers are the ones who needed to manage their aggro generation. I’d rather tanks get aggro management back, but it be something they handle themselves in more interactive ways than just “tank stance ON” and provoke/shirk. Imagine, for example, a reworked Divine Veil for Paladin that looks something like this:

Grants a buff to self and nearby party members for 15 seconds. Restores HP to target with a potency of 200 when target recovers HP; this effect can only trigger once per 3 seconds. Additionally, you receive 150% of enmity generated from healing on the target.

In other words, rather than directly competing with a healer’s healing, it adds additional healing when your healer heals, takes all the aggro they would generate for that healing and multiplies it.

Tanks could instead of having tank stance, have more effects like this that allow them to manage their aggro in ways that are more unique to different situations. Along with having some standard ways of managing aggro too of course.

Also, it would be cool if tanks had front positionals.

I am an advocate for aggro being something I have to manage myself.

front positionals though...please god no.

[ty_taurus]

I am an advocate for aggro being something I have to manage myself.

front positionals though...please god no.

If you’re the main tank all your attacks are going to hit at the front anyway. Or inversely you could have some actions that are stronger when attack enemies of which you have the highest enmity. That’s one way you could more subtly establish a main tank/off tank duality.

Warrior and Paladin have certain attacks that hit harder when you have the most enmity.

[Zairava]

If you’re the main tank all your attacks are going to hit at the front anyway. Or inversely you could have some actions that are stronger when attack enemies of which you have the highest enmity. That’s one way you could more subtly establish a main tank/off tank duality.

Warrior and Paladin have certain attacks that hit harder when you have the most enmity.

I'm not worried about not hitting them as the main tank, I'm worried about how that would conflict with tank specific mechanics as the off-tank.

I actually like positionals, but I think that they haven't existed on tanks for pretty good reason. Outside of the fact you'll always be facing the front of boss, anyway. Tank positionals would only really be relevant for the off-tank...which..actually...huh.

If they were to introduce positionals on tanks, that would theoretically make it open to abilities in the kit to have MT abilities back (think Blood Price) without people having a stroke over losing damage while not MT

Still though, I don't see them doing something like this when they've been removing positionals gradually anyway

[LilimoLimomo]

If you’re the main tank all your attacks are going to hit at the front anyway.

This is probably true most of the time, but there are plenty of exceptions. It's pretty common for bosses to have attacks where their facing isn't determined by their primary aggro target; Coin-counter, the ShB's dungeon Berserker, the normal raid Shadowkeeper fight, etc.

[ty_taurus]

The idea was more like, the front positionals are for the main tank, not the off tank, like the positional effect is increased enmity generation. But I think the bigger flaw isn’t actually with the positionals themselves but bosses that don’t have positionals and thus always trigger them. Like if you’re facing a wall boss, the off tank would be triggering the extra enmity as well.

Maybe it would make more sense to have certain actions that have different effects based on if you’re at the top of a target’s threat table or not. Like if you’re at the top of the threat table, the action inflicts a damage down debuff and further increases enmity. If you’re second on the threat table, the attack deals increased damage.

[Absurdity]

The idea was more like, the front positionals are for the main tank, not the off tank, like the positional effect is increased enmity generation. But I think the bigger flaw isn’t actually with the positionals themselves but bosses that don’t have positionals and thus always trigger them. Like if you’re facing a wall boss, the off tank would be triggering the extra enmity as well.

Maybe it would make more sense to have certain actions that have different effects based on if you’re at the top of a target’s threat table or not. Like if you’re at the top of the threat table, the action inflicts a damage down debuff and further increases enmity. If you’re second on the threat table, the attack deals increased damage.

I don't think you can attach any kind of DPS bonus to being the main or off tank, it will inevitably create issues with people not wanting to take the spot that makes them do less damage for basically no reason.
We already had that problem when all it did was mess with your opener and I doubt you're gonna get that out of the playerbase at this point.

The other issue with frontal positionals, depending on what they end up doing, is bosses with any kind of AoE busters or cleaves.