I made this small comparison earlier, I changed the benchmark gamma to 0 and I think it's similarish in color. The Bench lacks alot of the darker shadows and also it lacks alot of the vibrancy of the the hair. I admit I'm not entirely knowledgable about the technical details of the new graphics so I'm merely looking at it from a stylistic/artistic perspective.

I used my keyboard's arrow keys to adjust the angle in both the bench and the current cc. I tried my best to take similarly lit shots but even that is hard to control due to how different the lighting in both is. My idea is to show the Jaw shape from outside. I encourage people to try doing that when doing comparison shots- I doubt an ideal shot is fair.

Slider Version



= The face was moved downwards? Which I don't care much about.
= The jaw is more round giving the face an 'egg' shape, there was a subtle angle going down [ Which is unfortunate because if I wanted a really plump look I'd go for other faces ]

While the change is subtle, it makes her face look abit hmm, puffy? I feel like this is a common issue that I'm seeing, puffy/round/soft.

I tried my best to keep the angle the same and everything is as exact as it can be, using the hair parting and ear tips as guidance but I do admit there's probably a margin of error somewhere because the CC doesn't have precise tools for rotation/resetting camera etc.