I didn't claim that you think you own the hunt personally or that you harass anyone.
But you have fallen into the Faloop rhetoric trap that tries to convince players that Faloop controls the hunt. Go back and read what you wrote again.
For a group to "owe" something (whether the debt is real or imaginary), the group would need to have control over that something (which generally means ownership) in order to have the authority to give it to whomever is requesting payment of the claimed debt (again, whether that debt is real or imaginary).
Faloop doesn't own or control the Hunt, the players who disrupt your "events" know that so why pretend they're approaching you trying to claim you owe them hunts? It only makes sense if you believe that Faloop does own/control the hunts in some fashion and that their actions are somehow taking away something that belongs to "your Discord".
If Faloop has "events" that are being disrupted because someone is participating in open world content intended for all players, perhaps Faloop should stop planning events around things it does not own/control.
No one should be getting harassed for any reason period.
It doesn't matter who spawned a hunt. SE has made it clear that a spawner has no rights over what they spawn.
It doesn't matter who pulled a hunt. SE has made it clear that hunts are free to be pulled on sight by anyone who sees them.
Whether the comments directed at those who pull a hunt before others are ready are serious enough to be considered harassment or not, they are most definitely a violation of TOS Prohibited Activities. "Attacking someone for doing something different from what you or others may feel is the norm."
Maybe EU is politer but I've seen some extremely vicious comments directed at someone who pulls in shout chat on the NA worlds. On several occasions the person pulling wasn't even "early" or they had accidently pulled the hunt, not intentionally.
What generates a lot of those comments? The Faloop guidelines posted in the Faloop Discord that gives members the impression that Faloop has some sort of authority over the hunt that it does not have. If Faloop wants to remove a member from Faloop that doesn't follow the Faloop guidelines, that's fine. Those guidelines do not apply to all players in game.
Complain about game design? We're free to complain in shout chat about game design.
Complain about another player? There absolutely are rules about that.
https://support.na.square-enix.com/f...&la=1&ret=rule
I wouldn't call it a bad experience. I would call it an enlightening experience.
As far as I could tell, Moo was being honest with me in our discussions. I was disgusted by many of the things said because of the elitism being expressed. No player or group of players should be attempting to control what other players can do. Faloop has crossed that line, including senior members trying to organize other members in reporting a player to get them banned even though that player had done nothing against the rules of the game.
There was also a dose of naivety on Moo's part during one discussion. His original intent for Faloop was it would be used by worlds that had truly unified hunt communities. There's no such thing as a truly unified hunt community, at least not for NA and probably not EU. Human beings are too diverse in nature. There are always those with different opinions and different ways of doing things. There are always the lone wolves that will play on their own terms without regarding for whatever communities might form around them.
I know that Moo was having to rethink what Faloop should be in the wake of world visit and data center travel. The former world hunt communities don't really exist anymore, unified or not. But that was something he was mentioning early last year when Dynamis was trying to get the Faloop-bot (Discord bot, not game bot) for that data center's Discord. I have no idea what decision he might have come to or even if he has.
Believe it or not, I do mention Faloop to players in game just as much as I mention Centurio. Everyone should have a choice about what will work best for them and I have no issues with the actual app. But at least Centurio isn't trying to control what other players do. It simply relays the information it receives and leaves it at that.
If someone wants to report a spawn on Centurio, they just need to have verified their character and self-selected the role for the appropriate channel. If someone wants to report a spawn on Faloop, they have to be vetted by senior Faloop members who will decide if they should be allowed to have reporting permission. Some are more lenient than others and will give such permission just by being asked. Some are more demanding. Either way, the player has to wait until someone else gives them the necessary permission.
So yes, when someone tries to bring up Faloop as if its superior then I am more than happy to share the reality of it. If someone is just a "sheepie" as Mao puts it, then Faloop probably is the better option for them. They don't need to do anything other than show up for a hunt. If you're a control freak, Faloop is the better option for you if you're able to accept the systems Faloop already has in place. If you dislike elitism or just want to hunt on your own terms within what the game allows, you're better off staying away from Faloop.




Reply With Quote

