Let's play a game: Save the Ancients!

[Cleretic]

It is foolish to continue to argue this with me, my position is based on what is available to the writers at this given moment were they to create or continue any threads involving the Ancients as they have never shut the door. Your biases are clear and are not being completely removed despite your aforementioned claim.

Then what 'evidence' do you have that just confiscating the Meteia would have left everything honky-dory? You can't hold someone's position to a standard that you refuse to hold yourself to.

Why does this matter? The truth of an argument does not change whether it is an accredited person in a specific field or a layman.

And this does matter, because any evidence to your actual main would show some level of indication of who you even are, and any known biases or expertise. Because what you're putting forward actually says the opposite: if we take that your main is the one you're showing, then you haven't even played Endwalker. How can we trust that you're a trustworthy person who knows what they're talking about, when the only evidence to your playtime is a character you blatantly boosted?

I'm not interested in picking up Cilia's argument for them; they're doing a bang-up job themselves. But you need to show your work.