What if we just removed Tank invulns

[rawker]

The moment a tank takes your advice, you will be running to the forums! "I was healing last night, and the tank absolutely REFUSED to use mitigation! L2P!"

It was a response to OP who wants invulns removed. Quite frankly, I don't want invulns removed. If they want a challenge, then they can just remove said invulns from their hotbar. No point dragging the rest of the player base just because of it

[Absurdity]

That's basically what I did in P7S. I refused to invuln Condensed Aero IIs in early prog because I couldn't trust the pug co-tanks to not just let me die on the next one.
So I just did the fight without Holmgang...well, until the Harvest cheese came up.

[Sylvain]

I personally like invuln as they allow your group to decide which mechanic to make simplier. What I don't like is that boss do so little TB that you can invuln almost ALL TB.

For instance, in TOP, you can decide wether you take the risk of invulning the TB at the end of P1 (timing is a bit strict, can easily lead to a wipe), but you get a smooth positioning for everyone.
Or you pop CD regularly but then need to invuln the TB right after in P2 because it just hits so hard, that you can't have CD for both the P1 and P2.

The issue is that in regular instance and even most savages, boss don't do enough TB as they too often TB only one tank (altough this has clearly been changed in the past 2 tiers of savage so that's great)