Quote Originally Posted by Solakor View Post
The problem is that one GM does not police things the same way that another GM does. There is no consistent policy how or what ppl are allowed to name their char. Yes you can report someone for anything in this game and if you are out of luck anything you say can be used against you in someones head. That is the issue. Not the names themselves, even though it is ridiculous they need to be changed.
This is far from a situation where anything is unfair or inconsistent? And how is this an issue of GMs being unfair? Their name violates ToS, 'loli' is not allowed nor should be. Trying to turn an argument that 'loli isn't sexual' into 'gms apply their rules unfairly and inconsistently' are two separate issues. Trying to turn this argument about 'loli' into the argument about 'gms being unfair' is going to make you and others who make similar claims look like they're pro-'loli', which isn't a good look for very obvious reasons. And if that is your argument, make it clear that it is, otherwise it's poorly structured since no one can tell what you're arguing about. Motte and Bailey fallacies do no one any good, especially you.

Ultimately GMs police to what the ToS says. If you wanna read through it and try to point out how they're unfair, sure? Maybe? Go ahead, but you can't make that assumption. We don't have the official SQE guidelines on how they're supposed to act. We pay to play their games and agree to follow their rules, not ours. We do not know the standards they are held to nor whether the GMs make the decision or their supervisors do. We can try to make the claim that it's unfair, but we have probably a quarter of the picture on how GM moderation works or is supposed to work. To try and act like we can tell if it's unfair or not is being deliberately ignorant for the sake of deflecting from the original issue of 'lolicon is bad'.